Responsiveness of Key Quality-of-Life Measures to Important Changes in the Lives of People With MS: The EQ-5D-3L and Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale Eight Dimensions

Author(s)

Goodwin E1, Michalowsky B2, Middleton R3, Hawton A4
1University of Exeter, Exeter, DEV, UK, 2German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Greifswald, Germany, 3Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, UK, 4University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, UK

OBJECTIVES: For healthcare treatments to be approved for use in the UK NHS, robust evidence is required of their impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommends the use of the EQ-5D. Concerns have been raised about the responsiveness of the EQ-5D in the context of multiple sclerosis (MS), however empirical evidence is limited. This research aims to assess the responsiveness of the EQ-5D-3L compared to an MS-specific utility measure, the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale Eight Dimensions (MSIS-8D), in people with MS.

METHODS: Analysis was undertaken using data from the UK MS Register (UKMSR), a prospective, longitudinal, cohort study with over 10,000 participants. We investigated changes in EQ-5D-3L and MSIS-8D values before and after (i) commencement of disease-modifying treatment and (ii) onset of new symptoms; and (iii) between time-points with/without a contemporary relapse. Responsiveness was evaluated using standardised response means (SRM), standardised effect sizes (SES) and paired t-tests.

RESULTS: Neither measure appeared responsive to DMT initiation (ie p > 0.05). Both measures were responsive to experiencing a relapse, with the MSIS-8D (mean change -0.047, p = 0.0001, SRM -0.330, SES -0.228) showing greater responsiveness than the EQ-5D (mean change -0.047, p = 0.0054, SRM -0.226, SES -0.139). Neither measure was responsive to experiencing new symptoms (EQ-5D SRM -0.095, SES -0.070; MSIS-8D SRM -0.138, SES -0.118), although the reduction on both measures was statistically significant (p<0.05). In all analyses, 95% confidence intervals for the SRMs indicated that the MSIS-8D was significantly more responsive than the EQ-5D-3L.

CONCLUSIONS: Although the MSIS-8D appears to offer greater responsiveness compared to the EQ-5D-3L, the responsiveness of both measures in this analysis was limited. This adds weight to existing concerns about the ability of QoL measures used in healthcare decision-making to fully capture treatment effects in MS.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2024-11, ISPOR Europe 2024, Barcelona, Spain

Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 12, S2 (December 2024)

Acceptance Code

P10

Topic

Methodological & Statistical Research

Topic Subcategory

PRO & Related Methods

Disease

Neurological Disorders, no-additional-disease-conditions-specialized-treatment-areas

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×