COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF GENE THERAPIES AUTHORIZED BY THE U.S. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION AND THE EUROPEAN MEDICINES AGENCY

Author(s)

Mana Rahimian, PharmD, MS1, Anna Pelc, MS, MBA, MPH1, Lawrence M. Brown, PharmD, PhD; FAPhA1, Marc L. Fleming, BSPharm, MPH, MS, PhD1, Vaishali Shukla, MSc, MSRA, MS, PhD1, Rosa Rodriguez-monguio, PhD, MS2, Enrique Seoane-Vazquez, PhD1;
1Department of Pharmaceutical Economic and Policy, Chapman University School of Pharmacy, Irvine, CA, USA, 2Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
OBJECTIVES: To compare the regulatory characteristics of gene therapies authorized by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA).
METHODS: Gene therapy authorization data were extracted from the FDA and EMA websites as of December 31, 2025, and analyzed descriptively.
RESULTS: Thirty gene therapies were authorized: 19 (63.3%) by both agencies, 8 (26.7%) by the FDA only, and 3 (10.0%) by the EMA only. Antineoplastic and immunomodulating agents accounted for the most authorizations (12, 40.0%), followed by therapies for blood and blood-forming organs (6, 20.0%) and alimentary tract and metabolism disorders (3, 10.0%). The FDA authorized 27 gene therapy products, of which 21 (77.8%) received priority review, 5 (18.5%) fast track designation, 9 (33.3%) breakthrough therapy designation, 9 (33.3%) regenerative medicine advanced therapy designation, 14 (51.9%) accelerated approval, 24 (88.9%) orphan drug designation, and 5 (18.5%) rolling review. Fidanacogene elaparvovec was discontinued from the market. The EMA authorized 22 gene therapies, with one additional therapy receiving a positive Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) opinion pending European Commission authorization. Five (22.7%) therapies were discontinued from the market. Among the 19 therapies authorized by both agencies, all indications differed in at least one element, including differences in disease characteristics (17, 89.5%), line-of-therapy (1, 5.3%), and age group (6, 31.6%). The FDA authorized most products first (14, 73.7%), with a median EMA authorization gap of 309.0 days (IQR, 281.0).
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of gene therapies were authorized by both agencies, with the FDA approving products earlier than the EMA by a median of less than one year. Most therapies targeted rare diseases and received expedite development and approval procedures. There were differences in the indications of gene therapies authorized by FDA and EMA.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2026-05, ISPOR 2026, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 29, Issue S6

Code

HPR117

Topic

Health Policy & Regulatory

Topic Subcategory

Approval & Labeling

Disease

SDC: Rare & Orphan Diseases, STA: Genetic, Regenerative & Curative Therapies, STA: Personalized & Precision Medicine

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×