SUSTAINED FACTOR IX LEVELS AT 5-YEARS AFTER ETRANACOGENE DEZAPARVOVEC - THE EXPONENTIAL DECAY MODEL MAY UNDERESTIMATE OBSERVED RESULTS
Author(s)
Hongseok Kim, PhD, Yinglei Li, PhD, Douglass Drelich, MD.
CSL Behring, King of Prussia, PA, USA.
CSL Behring, King of Prussia, PA, USA.
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: Clinical trials of etranacogene dezaparvovec demonstrated increases in factor IX (FIX) activity levels in adult patients with hemophilia B (PWHB). However, the long-term durability of gene therapy still relies upon model-based prediction. Consequently, we developed a Bayesian linear mixed model to predict mean FIX activity levels and tested the validity of the exponential decay assumption.
METHODS: A combined dataset of 55 responding PWHB from Phase 2b (2.5 years) and Phase 3 (2 years) studies of etranacogene dezaparvovec were used for developing the model. The predicted FIX activity levels post-infusion were compared to 5-year observations. The model was then re-estimated incorporating the 5-year data and compared to the actual observation.
RESULTS: Mean predicted FIX levels at 5 years post infusion (33.5%) were lower than observed (36.7%), but within the 95% credible interval [6.5, 104.3]. When 5-year observed data was included, the predicted mean FIX level at 5 years post infusion still underestimated observed results (32.4% predicted vs 36.7% observed).
CONCLUSIONS: Although the exponential decay assumption appeared to align with the 2-year HOPE-B FIX trend, it may not have fully captured the plateau observed in longer-term (5-year) results. Including the 5-year data did not improve predictions suggesting the exponential decay model doesn’t accurately represent the observed FIX trajectory and may underestimate the gene therapy durability. Using non-linear modelling methods which reflect the more recent clinical data may increase confidence in the durability of gene therapy.
METHODS: A combined dataset of 55 responding PWHB from Phase 2b (2.5 years) and Phase 3 (2 years) studies of etranacogene dezaparvovec were used for developing the model. The predicted FIX activity levels post-infusion were compared to 5-year observations. The model was then re-estimated incorporating the 5-year data and compared to the actual observation.
RESULTS: Mean predicted FIX levels at 5 years post infusion (33.5%) were lower than observed (36.7%), but within the 95% credible interval [6.5, 104.3]. When 5-year observed data was included, the predicted mean FIX level at 5 years post infusion still underestimated observed results (32.4% predicted vs 36.7% observed).
CONCLUSIONS: Although the exponential decay assumption appeared to align with the 2-year HOPE-B FIX trend, it may not have fully captured the plateau observed in longer-term (5-year) results. Including the 5-year data did not improve predictions suggesting the exponential decay model doesn’t accurately represent the observed FIX trajectory and may underestimate the gene therapy durability. Using non-linear modelling methods which reflect the more recent clinical data may increase confidence in the durability of gene therapy.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2026-05, ISPOR 2026, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Value in Health, Volume 29, Issue S6
Code
MSR98
Topic
Methodological & Statistical Research
Disease
SDC: Rare & Orphan Diseases, SDC: Systemic Disorders/Conditions (Anesthesia, Auto-Immune Disorders (n.e.c.), Hematological Disorders (non-oncologic), Pain), STA: Genetic, Regenerative & Curative Therapies