EARLY PATTERNS IN SECOND ORPHAN DRUG DESIGNATIONS FOLLOWING EXPANSION OF THE ORPHAN DRUG EXCLUSION

Author(s)

Julie Patterson, PharmD, PhD, Haley McKeefer, PharmD, MHA, MS, Kenneth Finegold, PhD;
National Pharmaceutical Council, Washington, DC, USA
OBJECTIVES: The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, signed 7/4/25, expanded the Inflation Reduction Act’s Orphan Drug Exclusion (ODE) making orphan drugs ineligible for Medicare negotiation, from drugs treating one and only one rare disease to those treating “one or more rare diseases.” This study describes the characteristics of drugs receiving a second orphan designation following the ODE expansion that reduced the disincentive to seeking such designations.
METHODS: Orphan designations granted from 7/5/2025-1/5/2026 were obtained from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)’s orphan drug database. Designations representing a second active designation for a given drug and manufacturer were identified by manual review (two PharmDs) using the FDA database and PharmaProjects. Drugs were excluded if FDA-approved for at least one nonorphan indication before 7/5/25. Therapeutic area, drug modality, and dates of European Union orphan designations were obtained from PharmaProjects. US disease prevalence estimates were recorded from targeted review of the SEER website, FDA briefing documents, and the Genetic and Rare Diseases Information Center. Drug and designation characteristics were summarized using descriptive statistics.
RESULTS: In the 6 months following ODE expansion, manufacturers of 27 orphan drugs received a second active designation. Most drugs (n = 15, 55.6%) were designated in rare cancers. Drugs receiving a second active designation were more often biologics (n = 13, 48.1%) than small molecule drugs (n = 10, 37.0%). Three drugs (11.1%) were cell or gene therapies. At least 12 (44.4%) of designations were in conditions affecting fewer than 50,000 Americans. For the subset of designations that could be identified in PharmaProjects, nine in ten (n =23/25, 92.0%) were obtained in the US prior to the European Union.
CONCLUSIONS: Second orphan drug designations following ODE expansion were concentrated in oncology and typically obtained earlier in the US than the EU. Future research will explore additional characteristics and comparative findings.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2026-05, ISPOR 2026, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 29, Issue S6

Code

HPR50

Topic

Health Policy & Regulatory

Topic Subcategory

Pricing Policy & Schemes

Disease

SDC: Rare & Orphan Diseases

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×