COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF SAVOLITINIB-OSIMERTINIB IN ADVANCED NON-SQUAMOUS NSCLC WITH MET AMPLIFICATION FOLLOWING EGFR-TKI RESISTANCE IN CHINA

Author(s)

Quan Sun, MD, Shang Yumeng, MD, Fang Zhang, Ph.D;
China Medical Education Association, Health Care Security and Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation Branch, Beijing, China
OBJECTIVES: In China, lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death. Most patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage. MET amplification (METamp) is a key resistance mechanism after EGFR-TKI therapy. Savolitinib-Osimertinib, the first globally approved oral dual-target regimen, significantly improved progression-free survival. This study evaluated its cost-effectiveness versus guideline-recommended Ivonescimab plus chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-squamous NSCLC harboring MET amplification after progression on EGFR‑TKI therapy.
METHODS: A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted from a Chinese healthcare perspective. A partitioned survival model with a 3-year horizon was developed, incorporating progression-free, progressed, and death states. Clinical inputs were derived from the SACHI trial, with matched adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) and risk-ratio extrapolation applied to address between-trial heterogeneity. Direct medical costs (drugs, grade ≥3 AEs) and localized utility values were included. Sensitivity analyses (one-way, probabilistic) and scenario analyses (varying MAIC covariate sets) were performed to test robustness.
RESULTS: Over 3 years, Savolitinib-Osimertinib yielded 1.37 QALYs at a cost of 335,460.02 CNY, compared with 0.52 QALYs at 260,445.32 CNY for chemotherapy-based therapy, resulting in an ICER of 88,122.57 CNY/QALY. This is below China’s willingness-to-pay threshold (1.5 × GDP per capita, 143,625.00 CNY/QALY). The ICER remained cost-effective in 5-year analyses (102,936.14 CNY/QALY). One-way sensitivity analysis identified drug price as the main driver, though ICER stayed under the threshold. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed 100% cost-effectiveness probability at the threshold. Scenario analyses with different MAIC adjustments consistently supported economic advantage (ICER 93,178 CNY/QALY).
CONCLUSIONS: Savolitinib-Osimertinib provides significantly improved survival and is cost-effective versus Ivonescimab plus chemotherapy for EGFR‑TKI-resistant, MET-amplified advanced non-squamous NSCLC in China. Findings are robust across multiple sensitivity and scenario analyses, supporting its inclusion in reimbursement lists to enhance patient access. Methodologically, the study demonstrates an approach to address cross-trial heterogeneity in health technology assessment.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2026-05, ISPOR 2026, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 29, Issue S6

Code

EE157

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Trial-Based Economic Evaluation

Disease

SDC: Oncology, SDC: Respiratory-Related Disorders (Allergy, Asthma, Smoking, Other Respiratory)

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×