BARRIERS AND FACILITATORS IMPACT PERSISTENCE OF SGLT2 INHIBITORS & GLP-1 RECEPTOR AGONISTS FOR TYPE 2 DIABETES: A QUALITATIVE STUDY WITH HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS

Author(s)

Bilqees Fatima, MPhil, PharmD1, Hua Chen, PhD1, Swapnil Rajpathak, DrPH, MD2, Jodie Gee, Pharm.D.3, Ekere J. Essien, PhD1, Jieni Li, MPH, PhD1, Sai S. Cheruvu, MPH1, Susan Abughosh, PhD1;
1University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Health Outcomes and Policy, Houston, TX, USA, 2Merck, North Wales, PA, USA, 3University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Pharmacy Practice and Translational Research, Houston, TX, USA
OBJECTIVES: Real-world persistence with SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists remains suboptimal among patients with type 2 diabetes, underscoring the need to understand healthcare provider-perceived reasons for discontinuation. This qualitative study was conducted to explore the key reasons for discontinuation of SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists from the perspective of healthcare providers.
METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 healthcare providers (HCPs), including primary care physicians (PCPs)/endocrinologists and clinical pharmacists who have experience prescribing SGLT2is and GLP1-RA for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using a thematic content analysis approach.
RESULTS: Across all PCPs/endocrinologists (n=8) and clinical pharmacists (n=7), cost was mentioned as the most common reason for discontinuation of therapy. Side effects and tolerability issues were identified as the second most common reason (6/7 pharmacists; 7/8 physicians), primarily due to gastrointestinal side effects associated with GLP-1 RA and genitourinary tract infections with SGLT2-i. Approximately one-third of HCPs (5/15) noted that patients often discontinue therapy due to plateau in weight loss effect for both drugs. Main facilitators identified for SGLT2-i and GLP-1 RA prescribing included cardiovascular benefits (15/15), weight loss effect (15/15) and A1c improvement (13/15) reported consistently by all providers.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings of the study underscore the importance of addressing affordability issues and setting expectations for potential side effects to facilitate better management, ultimately leading to improved adherence and subsequent long-term outcomes in T2D patients.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2026-05, ISPOR 2026, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 29, Issue S6

Code

HSD3

Topic

Health Service Delivery & Process of Care

Disease

SDC: Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders (including obesity)

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×