DEVELOPING AND VALIDATING A CULTURALLY-ADAPTED OPTIMAL SHORT-FORM OF THE EDINBURGH POSTNATAL DEPRESSION SCALE (EPDS) USING RISKSLIM
Author(s)
Xiu Xia, Master, Rui Deng, PhD, Yuan Huang, PhD.
School of Public Health, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
School of Public Health, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
OBJECTIVES: Routine depression screening in maternal healthcare can aid in preventing and controlling perinatal depression which is linked to adverse obstetric outcomes. However, the effectiveness of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) for screening could be limited in contexts that require large-scale, rapid administration, and particularly when used across multi-ethnic populations. Therefore, this study aims to equip healthcare workers at primary level with a brief, practical tool to improve screening efficiency.
METHODS: In May 2022, EPDS was used to screen 1,191 women from pregnancy to one year postpartum in an ethnic-minority autonomous county of Yunnan Province. Data were randomly divided into training set and test set in a ratio of 7:3. Risk-Calibrated Supersparse Linear Integer Model (RiskSLIM) was utilized for developing short-form EPDS models on the training set with Python 3.13. Models performance were assessed with the Area Under the Receiver Operative Characteristic Curve (AUC) and R-squared (R2). The cultural adaption of models were validated across the datasets of Han majority, Zhuang, Miao, Yao, and other minorities. The optimal cut-off value was determined by Restricted Cubic Splines.
RESULTS: Short-form models of EPDS from 1 to 9 items were constructed with RiskSLIM. Item 2 (can not look forward with enjoyment to things), Item 5 (scared or panicky), item 7 (sleep difficulties), and item 8 (sad or miserable) were selected into the 4-item version EPDS (EPDS-R4), which exhibited consistently high and stable AUC (0.980-0.998) and R² values (0.721-0.921) across multi-ethnic population. The cut-off score of ≥ 10 was recommended.
CONCLUSIONS: EPDS-R4 (cut-off value ≥10) is an efficient and practical screening tool for perinatal depression, which might be adopted in population-based screening program.
METHODS: In May 2022, EPDS was used to screen 1,191 women from pregnancy to one year postpartum in an ethnic-minority autonomous county of Yunnan Province. Data were randomly divided into training set and test set in a ratio of 7:3. Risk-Calibrated Supersparse Linear Integer Model (RiskSLIM) was utilized for developing short-form EPDS models on the training set with Python 3.13. Models performance were assessed with the Area Under the Receiver Operative Characteristic Curve (AUC) and R-squared (R2). The cultural adaption of models were validated across the datasets of Han majority, Zhuang, Miao, Yao, and other minorities. The optimal cut-off value was determined by Restricted Cubic Splines.
RESULTS: Short-form models of EPDS from 1 to 9 items were constructed with RiskSLIM. Item 2 (can not look forward with enjoyment to things), Item 5 (scared or panicky), item 7 (sleep difficulties), and item 8 (sad or miserable) were selected into the 4-item version EPDS (EPDS-R4), which exhibited consistently high and stable AUC (0.980-0.998) and R² values (0.721-0.921) across multi-ethnic population. The cut-off score of ≥ 10 was recommended.
CONCLUSIONS: EPDS-R4 (cut-off value ≥10) is an efficient and practical screening tool for perinatal depression, which might be adopted in population-based screening program.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2026-05, ISPOR 2026, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Value in Health, Volume 29, Issue S6
Code
P32
Topic
Patient-Centered Research
Topic Subcategory
Instrument Development, Validation, & Translation