Published Feb 2026
Citation
Rylands AJ, Maruszczyk K, Aiyegbusi OL, et al. Designing and implementing real world patient reported outcomes (RW-PROs) - emerging recommendations: a Good Practices Report of an ISPOR Task Force. Value Health. In Press. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2026.02.018
Abstract
The increasing use of real-world evidence (RWE) in regulatory, reimbursement, and clinical decision making has highlighted the need for high quality patient reported outcomes (PROs) collected outside traditional trial environments. Although PROs are well established in controlled clinical trials, their application in prospective real-world studies introduces methodological and operational challenges not fully addressed in existing guidance. As a result, stakeholders face uncertainty about how to generate real world PRO (RW-PRO) data that are both feasible to collect in routine care and sufficiently robust for decision use.
This Task Force reviewed emerging methodological considerations relevant to the prospective collection of PROs in real world settings and examined how RW-PROs can complement clinical outcomes to capture patients lived experience and treatment effectiveness in everyday practice. The Task Force identified 9 interrelated methodological considerations when planning or implementing RW-PRO studies: defining clear study objectives; engaging patients as partners; ensuring representativeness; selecting fit for purpose instruments; supporting data quality; implementing feasible assessment strategies; applying rigorous analytical approaches; using technology responsibly; and engaging early with regulatory and HTA bodies.
Full Content
Log In to View ReportRelated Content
Reports
- Recommendations on the Selection, Development, and Modification of Performance Outcome (PerfO) Assessments
- Updated Recommendations on Evidence Needed to Support Measurement Comparability Among Modes of Data Collection for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
- Patient-Reported Outcome and Observer-Reported Outcome Assessment in Rare Disease Clinical Trials
- Clinician-Reported Outcome Assessments of Treatment Benefit-Clinical Outcome Assessment Emerging Good Practices Task Force
- Clinical Outcome Assessments: A Conceptual Foundation Good Practices for Outcomes Research Task Force
- PRO Data Collection in Clinical Trials Using Mixed Modes
- Pediatric Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments for Research to Support Medical Product Labeling
- Validation of Electronic Systems to Collect Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Data - Recommendations for Clinical Trial Teams
- Content Validity - Establishing and Reporting the Evidence in Newly Developed Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Instruments for Medical Product Evaluation Part 1
- Content Validity – Establishing and Reporting the Evidence in Newly Developed Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Instruments for Medical Product Evaluation Part 2
- Use of Existing Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Instruments and Their Modification
- Multinational Trials – Recommendations on the Translations Required, Approaches to Using the Same Language in Different Countries, and the Approaches to Support Pooling the Data
- Recommendations on Evidence Needed to Support Measurement Equivalence between Electronic and Paper-Based Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures
- Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures
Questions?
For any questions about this report please contact us.