Patient Experience Information (PEI) and Patient Involvement in Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Processes in 7 European Countries Using Immuno-Oncology Examples: How CAN the Patient Voice Make an IMPACT?

Author(s)

Brogan A1, Patel CK2, Schoenherr N3, Bobiak S4
1AESARA, SAN DIEGO, CA, USA, 2AESARA, Chapel Hill, NC, USA, 3Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, 4EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc., Billerica, MA, USA

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES : In 2018, the European Patients’ Academy on Therapeutic Innovation (EUPATI) released guidance about patient involvement in HTAs. We explored practical implications at the country level and how the patient’s voice affects HTA recommendations.

METHODS : A review of recently published HTA advice on immuno-oncology treatments was used to inform in-depth, qualitative interviews with HTA advisors in 7 European countries. Publicly available, English-language HTAs by IQWiG and NICE were used to gauge the practical impact of PEI and patient involvement in HTAs.

RESULTS : Interviews with HTA advisors revealed that all HTA agencies surveyed require patient participation except in Italy, where AIFA must make a formal request. In Germany, PEI can lead to an additional benefit evaluation by following IQWiG’s prescriptive requirements and scientific rigor. In France, there is an opportunity for manufacturers to provide quantitative PEI; however, monetizing outcomes will not be well received by the HAS transparency commission. In Italy and Spain, PEI provides a competitive opportunity, and postprogression PEI translated into budget impact could be influential. In cost-effectiveness countries (Netherlands, Sweden, UK), PEI must be translated into cost/quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) to maximize its impact, and postprogression PEI may lead to improved cost/QALYs over extended time periods. There are opportunities (e.g., patient interviews, patient testimonials) beyond classic PRO data, but HTA agencies may require additional analysis to address bias concerns. Pharmaceutical manufacturers play a critical role in bringing the patient perspective into HTA decision-making.

CONCLUSIONS : Current European HTAs do not meet EUPATI guidelines regarding level of patient involvement. There are opportunities for PEI to provide differentiation among treatment options and affect HTA decisions. Manufacturers should collect PEI in clinical trials and real-world evidence studies, analyze these data with scientific rigor, and translate the information into market-specific outcomes (e.g., cost/QALYs, budget impact) to maximize the influence of the patient’s voice with European HTA bodies.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2020-11, ISPOR Europe 2020, Milan, Italy

Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue S2 (December 2020)

Code

PCN318

Topic

Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Health State Utilities, Patient Engagement, Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes, Stated Preference & Patient Satisfaction

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×