THE VALUE OF ONASEMNOGENE ABEPARVOVEC (AVXS-101) AS A COST-EFFECTIVE GENE REPLACEMENT THERAPY FOR SPINAL MUSCULAR ATROPHY TYPE 1 IN IMPROVING SURVIVAL, HEALTHCARE RESOURCE UTILIZATION, AND MOTOR FUNCTION
Author(s)
Malone DC1, Arjunji R2, Dean R3, Sproule DM2, Feltner DE2, Droege M2, Khan F2, Maru B2, Jensen I3, Dabbous O2
1University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA, 2AveXis, Inc., Bannockburn, IL, USA, 3Precision Xtract, Boston, MA, USA
OBJECTIVES: Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type 1 (SMA1) is a rapidly progressing, debilitating neurodegenerative disease resulting from bi-allelic survival motor neuron 1 (SMN1) deletion/mutation. Onasemnogene abeparvovec (AVXS-101), an investigational gene replacement therapy, delivers human SMN via one-time administration. This study highlights the value of AVXS-101 for SMA1 and assesses its cost-effectiveness versus the current standard of care, nusinersen, in the U.S. METHODS: Twelve SMA1 patients were treated with a one-time intravenous AVXS-101 infusion (NCT02122952; cohort 2; proposed therapeutic dose); event-free survival (composite endpoint of time-to-death or permanent ventilation), pulmonary/nutritional interventions, swallowing, hospitalizations, CHOP-INTEND scores, and safety were assessed for 2 years. A multi-state survival Markov model over a lifetime was developed. Motor milestones, survival, healthcare costs, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were estimated using natural history and clinical trial data for SMA1 patients. Quality of life utility weights were obtained from the CHERISH trial. RESULTS: All 12 patients survived event-free; 7 did not require daily noninvasive ventilation; 11 had stable/improved swallowing; and 11 were able to speak. Patients experienced a mean 2.1 (range, 0–7.6) hospitalizations/year and 1.4 (0–4.8) respiratory hospitalizations/year. CHOP-INTEND rapidly increased by 9.8 (standard deviation [SD], 3.9) and 15.4 (SD, 6.4) points at 1- and 3-months post-dose, respectively. At long-term follow-up, 11 patients sat unassisted, 4 stood with assistance, and 2 walked independently. Adverse events included elevated serum aminotransferase levels, attenuated by prednisolone. Undiscounted total QALYs/patient were 30.3 for AVXS-101 and 7.2 for nusinersen. Estimated discounted lifetime costs were $6.33M for nusinersen and $3.7-4.7M for AVXS-101 at hypothetical prices of $2-3M/dose, resulting in cost savings and QALY gains compared to nusinersen. CONCLUSIONS: In the NCT02122952 study, AVXS-101 improved survival and motor function in SMA1 patients while being cost-effective compared to nusinersen. The reduced healthcare utilization in treated infants could also alleviate patient/caregiver/societal burden and improve quality of life.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2019-09, ISPOR Latin America 2019, Bogota, Colombia
Value in Health Regional, Volume 20S (October 2019)
Code
PBI1
Topic
Clinical Outcomes, Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy, Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies, Performance-based Outcomes, Trial-Based Economic Evaluation
Disease
Neurological Disorders, Pediatrics, Rare and Orphan Diseases