RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN COMBINATION THERAPY TREATMENT REGIMENS AND MEASUREMENTS OF CONTROL IN MODERATE TO SEVERE ASTHMA

Author(s)

Jonathan D Campbell, MS, PhD Graduate Student1, Larry Borish, MD, Professor of Medicine2, Lawrence Rasouliyan, MPH, Senior Statistical Analyst3, Tmirah Haselkorn, PhD, Epidemiologist4, June Lee, MD, Clinical Researcher4, Sally Wenzel, MD, Professor of Medicine5, Sean D. Sullivan, PhD, Professor11University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; 2 University of Virgina Health Systems, Charlottesville, VA, USA; 3 Ovation Research Group, San Francisco, CA, USA; 4 Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA; 5 National Jewish Medical Research Center, Denver, CO, USA

OBJECTIVES: Current guidelines recommend inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) as first-line therapy in persistent asthma and the addition of long-acting ß-agonists (LABAs) in patients with moderate-to-severe disease. Our study objective was to assess the response of high-dose salmeterol/fluticasone combination (SFC) and low-dose SFC compared to a control group using a vast array of asthma-related health outcomes in a large cohort of patients with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma. METHODS: Three adult (°Ý18 years) cohorts from The Epidemiology and Natural History of Asthma: Outcomes and Treatment Regimens (TENOR) 3-year observational study were defined: patients on SFC Low-Dose (100/50 or 250/50 µg), patients on SFC High-Dose (500/50 µg), and patients on other medications (including salmeterol and fluticasone), but not on SFC. Using standard regression methods, we computed unadjusted and propensity score adjusted differences in 24 month outcomes between the treatment cohorts. RESULTS: After adjustment for confounding, the Low-Dose SFC cohort had higher asthma-related quality of life (P=0.0026), fewer asthma control problems (P=0.0001), similar rates of exacerbations (P=0.8932), marginally higher FEV1 (P=0.0777) and lower odds of having severe asthma (P=0.0454) compared with controls (patients never on SFC). After adjustment for confounding, the High-Dose SFC cohort had no difference in asthma-related quality of life, asthma control problems, or exacerbation rates (P=0.1879, 0.3015, 0.3560 respectively), higher FEV1 (P=0.0011), and higher odds of having severe asthma (P=0.0137). CONCLUSION: The results support evidence that some asthmatics achieve better control while taking low-dose SFC, but also suggest that high-dose SFC fails to provide clinically significant benefit in terms of most asthma-related health outcomes when compared to similar patients not taking high-dose SFC. These findings may highlight an unmet need in severe or difficult-to-treat asthma and call for alternative therapeutic approaches in those unable to attain asthma control with or without SFC.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2007-05, ISPOR 2007, Arlington, VA, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 10, No.3 (May/June 2007)

Code

PAA1

Topic

Clinical Outcomes

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy

Disease

Respiratory-Related Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×