A DECISION TREE APPROACH TO ESTIMATING COST SAVINGS OF PAY FOR PERFORMANCE PROGRAMS IN A PPO SETTING

Author(s)

Antonio P Legorreta, MD, MPH, Adjunct Professor1, Haijun Tian, PhD, Health Services Researcher2, Amanda S Gilmore, MPH, Researcher3, Kira Ryskina, BA, Researcher3, Greg Legorreta, None, Research Associate2, Matthew Robinson, MPH, Researcher2, Deborah Taira, Sc, D, Researcher4, Richard Chung, MD, Sr. Vice President41UCLA School of Public Health, Woodland Hills, CA, USA; 2 Health Benchmarks, Woodland Hills, CA, USA; 3 Health Benchmarks, Inc, Woodland Hills, CA, USA; 4 HMSA, Honolulu, HI, USA

OBJECTIVES: Pay-for-performance is gaining popularity and acceptance as an approach to improve quality and efficiency of healthcare in the U.S.. However, little evidence regarding the economic feasibility of this approach is currently available in the literature. Our objective was to examine the cost savings of a quality-based physician incentive program implemented in a PPO setting. METHODS: Administrative claims data for 2003-2005 were obtained from a voluntary physician incentive program implemented by a large non-profit health plan in Hawaii and used to calculate all costs and probabilities included in the decision tree. Health plan members were categorized into two groups: those who visited only physicians who participated in the program and those who visited only non-participating physicians during the study period. Rates of recommended care for two evidence-based quality of care indicators – glycosylated hemoglobin testing and lipid panel testing for members with diabetes – were compared between the two groups to determine program effectiveness. Program costs included administrative costs, the cost of quality of care evaluation, and physician reimbursement. Quality indicators that included several procedures were assigned a weighted average cost. One year events included severe diabetic complications. RESULTS: Average program cost per enrollee was $21; the average cost of receiving the two tests was $18; and the cost of developing relevant complications was $6470. With the incentive program, the health plan saved approximately $18 per adult diabetic considering just the two indicators (i.e., total program costs were distributed across just the two indicators for the purposes of this analysis), which translated to two year savings ranging from $2.5 to $6.7 million. CONCLUSION: Physician reimbursement models built upon evidence-based quality of care metrics may result in direct cost savings to the health plan within a relatively short follow-up time, in addition to positively affecting delivery of high quality, recommended care.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2007-05, ISPOR 2007, Arlington, VA, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 10, No.3 (May/June 2007)

Code

PQ3

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Health Service Delivery & Process of Care

Topic Subcategory

Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies, Health Care Research, Quality of Care Measurement

Disease

Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×