A COMPARISION OF THE PSYCHOMETRICS PROPERTIES OF HEALTH RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE INSTRUMENTS USED IN GLIOBLASTOMA MULTIFORME PATIENTS

Author(s)

Amy E Walthour, BS, MD/PhD Student, Duska M Franic, PharmD, PhD, Assistant Professor University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate brain cancer specific health related quality-of-life (HRQOL) instruments used in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients for group and individual level decision-making. METHODS: An extensive literature search was conducted to identify brain cancer specific HRQOL instruments using several databases including Medline, PsycINFO, and Health and Psychosocial Instruments. Key search terms included “quality of life” and “glioblastoma”. Only brain cancer specific HRQOL instruments evaluating GBM patients were retained for evaluation of item information, practicality, breadth, depth, reliability (group level based on Nunnally & Bernstein 1994 and individual level based on McHorney & Tarlov 1995 criteria), validity and responsiveness. RESULTS: Four instruments were identified: extended Rotterdam Symptom Checklist (e-RSCL); European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality-of-life core 30 (EORTC QLQ C30) with brain cancer module (BCM20); EORTC QLQ C30+3 with BCM20; and a newly developed instrument deriving its core from the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) with addition of a brain cancer module (BC). The EORTC QLQ C30 was the most widely used instrument and satisfied practicality, breadth and validity criteria (convergent: r=0.61-0.70, p<0.05; known-groups: p<0.05). This instrument offered the most extensive reliability information with 4 of 9 domains meeting the 0.70 criterion for group level decision-making. The SIP core with BC was notable for high levels of missing psychometric data. CONCLUSION: Measuring the impact of treatment on HRQOL is critical, especially in terminal conditions. However, none of the instruments in this study met the criteria for individual level decision-making. This was due in part to unavailable psychometric data as well as data not meeting study criteria. Based on the results from this study, the EORTC QLQ C30 is recommended for use in group level decision-making in conjunction with another HRQOL instrument, for example a generic instrument. Further studies are required to evaluate the psychometric properties of the BCM20.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2007-05, ISPOR 2007, Arlington, VA, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 10, No.3 (May/June 2007)

Code

PCN53

Topic

Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×