ALENDRONATE AND HORMONE REPLACEMENT THERAPY (HRT) IN THE PREVENTION OF OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURE IN THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD)- AN ANALYSIS USING NET-BENEFIT REGRESSION

Author(s)

Tiller KW1, Rascati KL2, Wilson JP21 Department of Defense Pharmacoeconomic Center, Fort Sam Houston, TX, USA; 2 University of Texas, Austin, TX, USA

OBJECTIVES: Objectives were: 1) to determine the effectiveness of osteoporosis medications; 2) to identify risk factors and other covariates that predict osteoporotic fractures; and 3) to determine the cost-effectiveness of osteoporosis medications. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using DOD claims from fiscal years 2000 to 2003. Using an intent-to-treat study design, a total of 49,851 women >= age 50 were followed. Differences in effectiveness (fracture/no fracture) were determined by both logistic and direct Cox proportional hazard regressions. To assess cost-effectiveness, a net-benefit regression method was employed. RESULTS: Findings showed that the three-year cumulative incidence of an osteoporotic fracture in this cohort was 2.5% (0.4% in patients without an osteoporosis diagnosis; 6.1% in patients with an osteoporosis diagnosis). The medication effectiveness results obtained from both regression models were consistent and suggested that women treated with the combination of alendronate and HRT were at lower risk for any fracture, hip fracture, and vertebral fracture when compared to no treatment, while comparisons of the individual medications with no treatment did not show a significant decrease in risk. Variables that significantly increased the risk of fracture were: prior fracture, increasing age, and oral corticosteroid use >= year. The net-benefit regression showed that the use of osteoporosis medications was not cost-effective overall in the short-term compared to no treatment. However, among high-risk populations, such as patients with a prior osteoporotic fracture or those >= 65, medications became more cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy with HRT and alendronate was more effective than no treatment in DOD women >= 50. None of the treatment options were cost-effective in the short-term for the overall population, but some were more cost-effective in subsets of high-risk patients. The results of this study were potentially influenced by the presence of selection bias, therefore propensity scoring will be conducted.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2005-05, ISPOR 2005, Washington, DC, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 8, No. 3 (May/June 2005)

Code

POS2

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Musculoskeletal Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×