COST-UTILITY ANALYSIS OF MAINTENANCE THERAPY WITH RITUXIMAB FOR FOLLICULAR LYMPHOMA IN BRAZIL

Author(s)

Carlos Sérgio Chiattone, PhD, Professor1, Mario Giorgio Saggia, MBA, Health Economics Manager2, Eduardo AV Santos, Bachelor, Health Economics Analyst21Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil; 2 Roche Brazil, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil

OBJECTIVES: Maintenance therapy with rituximab has shown significant improvements in overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) when compared with observation in patients with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma (van Oers et al, 2006). The primary objective of this analysis was to estimate the incremental cost-efectiveness ratio (ICER) of rituximab maintenance therapy versus observation alone, based on data from the EORTC 20981 study. METHODS: Rituximab maintenance therapy (375 mg/m2 every 3 months) was evaluated using a Markov model. All patients entered in the model following response to CHOP chemotherapy +/- rituximab as induction therapy. PFS and Overall Survival (OS) following rituximab maintenance were extrapolated from 2-year Kaplan-Meier curves from the study data using a parametric approach. Cox-Snell and deviance residuals were analysed. Quality-of-life utility values were derived from a study of 165 patients using the EQ-5D questionnaire. Direct annual medical costs including adverse events, drug acquisition, administration and preparation were estimated accordingly to a Delphi panel with Brazilian haematologists. Costs were reported in 2007 Brazilian Reais. Both costs and outcomes were discounted at 3.5% rate according to NICE/UK recommendation. In order to assess uncertainty, probabilistic sensitivity analyses were also performed. A lifetime horizon and a payer perspective in Brazil were adopted. RESULTS: Rituximab maintenance resulted in a gain of 1.79 QALYs (5.96 vs 4.17) at an incremental cost of R$ 57,595 The ICER of rituximab maintenance vs. observation alone is, therefore, estimated to be R$ 32,236 per QALY gained. The ICER of rituximab maintenance was sensitive to the duration of treatment benefit, discount rate and drug cost. CONCLUSION: In patients responding to induction therapy, rituximab maintenance therapy improves overall survival and progression-free survival compared with observation alone. Results suggest that maintenance therapy with rituximab is a cost-effective intervention for the management of patients with follicular lymphoma in the Brazilian Private Healthcare System.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2007-10, ISPOR Europe 2007, Dublin, Ireland

Value in Health, Vol. 10, No. 6 (November/December 2007)

Code

PCN49

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Oncology, Systemic Disorders/Conditions

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×