COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF FIRST EYE CATARACT SURGERY IN ELDERLY WOMEN- A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Author(s)

Tracey H Sach, PhD, Lecturer in Health Economics1, Alexander JE Foss, FRCOphth, MRCP, Consultant ophthalmologist2, Richard M Gregson, DPhil(Oxon), FRC, Consultant2, Anwar Zaman, Unknown, Clinical Director of Opthalmology2, Francis Osborn, Unknown, Unknown2, Tahir Masud, MBBS, MA, FRCP, Professor in Musculoskeletal Gerontology2, Rowan H Harwood, Unknown, Consultant21University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom; 2 Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom

OBJECTIVES: Whilst the sight-restoring effects of surgery in patients with severe bilateral cataract are obvious, there has been a significant trend over the last two decades of performing cataract surgery at an increasingly earlier stage with a rising proportion having 6/12 vision or better at the time of listing. In these circumstances, the cost-effectiveness of surgery is open to question. Therefore, this study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of first-eye cataract surgery compared to no surgery from a Health Service and Personal Social Services perspective. METHODS: An economic evaluation was undertaken alongside a randomised controlled trial of first-eye cataract surgery in secondary care ophthalmology clinics. A total of 306 women over 70 years old with bilateral cataracts were randomised to cataract surgery (expedited, approximately 4 weeks) or control (routine, 12 months wait). Seventy-five percent of participants had baseline acuity of 6/12 or better. Health and social service contacts were collected at individual patient level from diaries ascertained at 3 and 9 months via telephone interviews, and at 6 and 12 months via face-to-face interviews. Outcomes included falls and Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs). RESULTS: The mean difference in cost between the operated and control group was £2004 (bootstrapped)(95% CI £1363 to £2833, p<0.001) over one year (UK£2004). However, those in the operated group experienced, on average, 0.456 fewer falls, representing an incremental cost per fall prevented of £4390. The bootstrapped mean gain in QALYs per patient was 0.056 (95% CI 0.006 to 0.108, p<0.001). The incremental cost utility ratio was £35,704, above the currently accepted UK threshold level of willingness to pay per QALY of £30,000. However, in a model of the costs and benefits over patients' expected lifetime, the incremental cost per QALY was £13,172, under conservative assumptions. CONCLUSION: First-eye cataract surgery, whilst cost-ineffective over the trial period, appeared cost-effective over participants' remaining lifetime.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2007-10, ISPOR Europe 2007, Dublin, Ireland

Value in Health, Vol. 10, No. 6 (November/December 2007)

Code

ES3

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Sensory System Disorders, Surgery

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×