COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF BIPHASIC INSULIN ASPART 30 VERSUS HUMAN PREMIX INSULIN FOR TYPE 2 DIABETES PATIENTS IN CHINA
Author(s)
Meaghan Lynch, MSc, Health Economist1, Huib Scheijbeler, MSc, Economics Associate2, Robert Kotchie, MSc, Health Economics and Outcomes Manager2, Steffen Nielsen, MSc, Health Economist3, Jeremy White, MSc, Health Economist4, William J Valentine, PhD, HEOR Manager51IMS Health, Shanghai, China; 2 IMS Health, London, United Kingdom; 3 Novo Nordisk A/S, Virum, Denmark; 4 Novo Nordisk International Operations A/S, Zurich, Switzerland; 5 IMS Health, Basel, Switzerland
OBJECTIVES: Type 2 diabetes patients treated with human premix insulin (with or without conventional oral antidiabetic agents) were converted to biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) in PRESENT, a single-arm observational study conducted in China (n=2289). Patients showed a reduction in HbA1c of 1.82% points and reduced rates of hypoglycemic events (1576 to 476 per 100 patient years) three months after therapy conversion. METHODS: A published and validated computer simulation model of diabetes (CORE Diabetes Model) was used to project short-term results obtained from PRESENT to estimate long-term clinical and cost outcomes for patients switching from human premix insulin to BIAsp 30 in a Chinese setting. Chinese patient characteristics and mortality were derived from published sources and primary research was performed to estimate costs of treating complications and management practices in a Chinese setting. Probabilities of complications were derived from landmark clinical and epidemiological studies. Total direct costs (complications + treatment costs) were projected over patient lifetimes for BIAsp 30 and current standard practice (baseline values). Future costs and clinical benefits were discounted at 3% annually. RESULTS: Short-term therapy benefits associated with BIAsp 30 versus human premix (improvement in HbA1c levels and a decrease in hypoglycemic events) were projected to increase life expectancy by 0.632 years and improve quality-adjusted life expectancy by 1.022 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) (7.664 ± 0.111 versus 6.641 ± 0.092 QALYs). BIAsp 30 reduced total direct costs by RMB 7,484 (RMB 230,926 ± 4,676 versus RMB 238,410 ± 4,970) due to decreasing the cost of treating diabetes-related complications (RMB 118,936 versus 147,449). CONCLUSION: The results indicated that BIAsp 30 is dominant (less cost with more health benefit) versus human premix in the treatment of type 2 diabetes patient in a Chinese setting, with lower direct costs and superior patient outcomes due to reductions in diabetic-related complications.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2007-10, ISPOR Europe 2007, Dublin, Ireland
Value in Health, Vol. 10, No. 6 (November/December 2007)
Code
PDB27
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders
Explore Related HEOR by Topic