COST-EFFECTIVENESS AND COST-UTILITY OF RITUXIMAB MAINTENANCE THERAPY FOR PATIENTS WITH RELAPSED/REFRACTORY FOLLICULAR LYMPHOMA IN FRENCH SETTING

Author(s)

Aurelie Pacull, PharmD, Ph, Health Economist1, Carole Coudray-Omnes, PharmD, Ph, Health Economist1, Pauline Brice, MD, Hematologist2, Eric Deconinck, MD, PhD, Hematologist3, Claude Le Pen, PhD, Health Economics4, Houda Miadi-Fargier, PharmD, Health Economist51Roche, Neuilly-Sur-Seine, France; 2 Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France; 3 INSERM U-645 Université de Franche-Comté CHU Jean Minjoz IFR 133, Besançon, France; 4 Dauphine University, Paris, France; 5 AREMIS - aegisnet, Neuilly sur Seine, France

OBJECTIVES: Rituximab maintenance therapy (RM) has been shown to significantly extend overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma (FL) in the pivotal trial EORTC20981. The purpose of this study was to assess, from the French Sickness Funds perspective, cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of RM after induction therapy versus current standard practice (observation). METHODS: A 3 health state lifetime transition model (30 years) was developed comparing RM and observation (Obs). PFS and OS were derived from the trial EORTC20981 with a median follow-up of 28 months and extrapolated from 2-year Kaplan-Meier curves using a Weibull distribution and were conservatively assumed to last only 5 years. Utility data were derived from a multicentric observational study using the EQ-5D questionnaire. Direct medical costs derived from French official sources. Costs were discounted at 3% and sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: RM is effective in the management of relapsed/resistant FL. The results showed that life expectancy and QALY were increased respectively by 22% and 30% in patients treated with RM. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was €7612 per life year gained. The cost per QALY gained was €8729. In one-way sensitivity analysis most of ratios fell within the range of €7,000 to €12,000 (the ICERs ranged from €5,700 to €43,300 per LYG and from 6,800€ to €49,700 per QALY). The frequency and cost of treatments upon relapse were identified as drivers for the model. Palliative care, transportation and indirect costs such as productivity loss were not included in the analysis. It was a conservative approach because it was expected that patients under RM would have less relapse and better life expectancy than those in observation. CONCLUSION: RM is a cost-effective strategy in the management of relapsed/refractory FL in France with an ICER largely below the threshold commonly cited in such analysis.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2007-10, ISPOR Europe 2007, Dublin, Ireland

Value in Health, Vol. 10, No. 6 (November/December 2007)

Code

EC4

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Systemic Disorders/Conditions

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×