UTILITIES OF METASTATIC BREAST CANCER PATIENTS (PT.) TREATED WITH TAXANES COMPARED TO UTILITIES OF ONCOLOGY NURSES (NUR)

Author(s)

Hauser R13, Theriault R2, Wilson J3, Shepherd M3, Lawson K3, Koeller J3, 1Abt Associates Clinical Trials, Cambridge, MA, USA; 2University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; 3University of Texas, Austin, TX, USA

Cost-utility analysis is rapidly becoming the standard pharmacoeconomic measure in oncology. In a recent report (JCO, 2000;18:3302), data from 40 published cost-utility studies were presented in a league table format. Most of those studies utilized nur. or physicians as proxies for the pt. in determining utility. OBJECTIVE: To determine if there is a difference between utility scores obtained from metastatic breast cancer pt. and oncology nur. METHODS: Using eight modified Markov modeled health states (Pharmacoeconomics, 1996; 60:504) describing metastatic breast cancer; the standard gamble procedure was utilized to obtain utility scores from 45 patients and 57 oncology nurses. Utility values were measured on a scale between 0.0 and 1.0. Independent t-tests were used to test for differences between groups using an alpha level of 0.05 (2-sided). RESULTS: Significant differences were found on all eight modeled health states: Modeled Disease State

Conference/Value in Health Info

2001-05, ISPOR 2001, Arlington, VA, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 4, No. 2 (March/April 2001)

Code

CN1

Topic

Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Health State Utilities

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×