AN ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF OSTEOPOROSIS MEDICATION USE PATTERNS IN A MANAGED CARE ORGANIZATION- A TIME TO FRACTURE ANALYSIS

Author(s)

Chen KS1, White TJ2, Chang E2, 1University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; 2Prescription Solutions, Costa Mesa, CA, USA

Osteoporosis affects approximately 24 million Americans and accounts for an estimated annual direct medical costs of over $13.8 billion. An economic analysis that evaluates the effectiveness of osteoporosis medications for prevention of bone fractures in a naturalistic setting has not been formally conducted. OBJECTIVES: To compare differences among four therapeutic alternatives [estrogen replacement therapy (ERT), raloxifene, nasal calcitonin, and alendronate] with respect to healthcare costs (pharmacy, medical, and total), and time to fracture. METHODS: Retrospective pharmacy and medical claims data from a large managed care organization were analyzed. Patients were included if they were diagnosed with osteoporosis and newly initiated on medication between 1/1/98-12/31/98. All patients were followed for exactly 1 year. Cost data was log-transformed to correct for skewness. ANCOVA was conducted to compare total healthcare costs; Cox Proportional Hazard Model was performed to compare the risk of fracture. Total healthcare costs was defined as all osteoporosis-related services covered. RESULTS: There were 12,757 female patients identified for the analysis and the average age was 70(S.D.=10). A total of 1,721(13.5%) patients had a fracture after initiation of drug therapy. After adjusting for age, prior medication costs, prior fracture event, and comorbidities, adjusted means (95%CI) of log-transformed total healthcare costs was lowest for ERT 5.87(5.84-5.90), compared to raloxifene 6.32(6.19-6.46), alendronate 6.55(6.51-6.59) and calcitonin 7.20(6.61-7.80). Compared to calcitonin, the adjusted hazard ratios (95%CI) for a fracture were 0.174(0.078-0.39) for ERT, 0.175(0.078-0.39) for alendronate, and 0.160(0.068-0.377) for raloxifene. CONCLUSIONS: In this population, ERT was associated with statistically significant lower total healthcare costs compared to raloxifene, alendronate, and calcitonin. Raloxifene was associated with statistically significant lower total healthcare costs compared to calcitonin and alendronate. Furthermore, hazard ratios showed that patients taking ERT, raloxifene, or alendronate were approximately 83% less likely to experience fracture at any point in time compared to calcitonin.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2001-05, ISPOR 2001, Arlington, VA, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 4, No. 2 (March/April 2001)

Code

PAM2

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Musculoskeletal Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×