THE IMPACT OF SCREENING ADHERENCE ON MEDICAL EFFECTIVENESS AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF CERVICAL CANCER SCREENING IN GERMANY – A DECISION ANALYSIS

Author(s)

Sroczynski G1, Voigt K2, Gibis B3, Aidelsburger P4, Engel J5, Wasem J4, Hillemanns P5, Hölzel D5, Goldie SJ6, Siebert U1, 1 Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; 2 Institute for Medical Informatics, Biostatistics, and Epidemiology, University of Munich, Munich, Germany; 3 National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians, Berlin, Germany; 4 University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg-Essen, Germany; 5 University of Munich, Munich, Germany; 6 Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, USA

OBJECTIVES: To systematically evaluate the impact of screening adherence on clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening (CCS) in Germany using a decision analytic approach. METHODS: A decision-analytic Markov model was used to evaluate long-term clinical and economic outcomes for the following CCS strategies: 1) no screening, 2) conventional Papanicolaou test with manual smear analysis (PAP), 3) PAP with automated smear analysis (AA), 4) liquid-based preparation (LP) with manual smear analysis and 5) LP in combination with AA. German clinical, epidemiological and economic data were used. German clinical practice in screening, diagnosis, and treatment of cervical cancer and its precursors were considered. Calculated outcomes were detected/prevented cervical cancer cases and deaths, life expectancy, lifetime costs, and discounted incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER). We adopted a societal perspective with a three percent (3%) annual discount rate. In the absence of individual data, screening adherence was modeled to be independent from screening history. RESULTS: In women adherent to screening, annual PAP saved 94 life days, when compared to “no screening”, and new CCS strategies saved additional 0.5 days. Assuming 50% adherence annual screening with new strategies would save additional 3 days compared to annual PAP screening with 50% adherence and would be nearly equally effective as annual PAP with complete adherence. Assuming a societal willingness-to-pay of 50,000€/LYS, annual PAP compared to “no screening” was cost-effective independent of screening adherence. Annual screening with new strategies compared to PAP was not cost-effective in adherent women, but may be cost-effective with 65% (AA) or 40% (LP or LP+AA) or lower adherence. CONCLUSIONS: For the current clinical standard of annual cervical cancer screening in Germany, PAP screening is both medical effective and cost-effective independent of adherence. New CCS strategies may be effective and cost-effective in women who do not regularly attend annual screening programs.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2004-10, ISPOR Europe 2004, Hamburg, Germany

Value in Health, Vol. 7, No. 6 (November/December 2004)

Code

PCN38

Topic

Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Adherence, Persistence, & Compliance

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×