THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF TREATING PATIENTS WITH RESTLESS LEGS SYNDROME (RLS) USING ROPINIROLE

Author(s)

Moore AP1, Lloyd A2, Scott DA2, Connolly M3, Dixon S4, 1 The Walton Centre for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Liverpool, UK; 2 Fourth Hurdle; 3 GlaxoSmithKline, London, Middlesex, UK; 4 Sheffield University, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK

OBJECTIVES: Idiopathic RLS (Ekbom syndrome) is a sensorimotor disorder that leads to disrupted sleep and poor quality of life. Until now, there have been no internationally approved treatments for this disorder. This study evaluated costs and outcomes resulting from the use of ropinirole in patients with RLS. METHODS: Data were combined from 553 patients enrolled in two matching, pivotal, randomized, 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies. Patients with moderate-to-severe RLS received ropinirole or placebo, with a maximum allowable dose of 4 mg/day. The primary outcome measure was the International Restless Legs Scale (IRLS). IRLS scores at baseline and study endpoint were mapped to the multi-attribute utility instrument EQ-5D based on expert opinion to derive Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs). Costs of study drug, concomitant neurological medications and cost of adverse events were applied in the model from the perspective of the UK NHS. Lower cost per QALY gained indicates better cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: Based on combined analysis of the entire treatment population over 12 weeks, the QALYs gained for ropinirole and placebo were 0.095 (0.082-0.106) and 0.075 (0.063-0.086), respectively. The mean costs per patient for ropinirole and placebo were £210.52 (£197-£223) and £42.34 (£34-£53), respectively. The incremental QALYs and costs were 0.020 (0.002-0.037) and £168.18 (£150-£187), respectively, resulting in an incremental cost per QALY of £8,405 (£4,557-£41,524). Extrapolation of IRLS scores at trial endpoint to 52 weeks improved the incremental QALY to £6748. For patients reporting more severe sleep disturbance or more severe symptoms at baseline, the cost-effectiveness ratios improved to £5810 (£3,210-£20,177) and £4,587 (£2,881-£10,508), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of an active-treatment comparator, this analysis found that treatment of moderate-to-severe RLS with ropinirole is cost-effective compared with placebo using conventional UK cost-effectiveness standards, particularly in patients with more severe sleep disturbance and severe RLS symptoms at baseline.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2004-10, ISPOR Europe 2004, Hamburg, Germany

Value in Health, Vol. 7, No. 6 (November/December 2004)

Code

PNL14

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Neurological Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×