PHARMACOECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF ANTIDEPRESSANTS IN BRAZIL

Author(s)

Márcio Machado, PharmD, PhD Candidate1, Michael Iskedjian, BPharm, MSc, President2, Inés Ruiz, PharmD, Professor1, Thomas R Einarson, PhD, Associate Professor31Facultad de Ciencias Quimicas y Farmaceuticas, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, RM, Chile; 2 PharmIdeas Research and Consulting Inc, Oakville, ON, Canada; 3 University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

OBJECTIVES: To determine cost-effectiveness of antidepressant groups (SNRIs, SSRIs, and TCAs) in treating major depressive disorder (MDD) over a 6-month time horizon from the viewpoint of the Brazilian Ministry of Health. METHODS: An existing decision tree model developed by our group was adapted to Brazil, based on Brazilian treatment guidelines. Clinical data were obtained from a published meta-analysis of remission rates published by Machado et al. Patients included adults >=18 with MDD, diagnosed using DSM-III/IV or comparable, with moderate-to-severe disease (HAMD>=15 or MADRS>=18), without comorbidities or comedications, and followed by >=6 weeks of treatment. Treatments included: SNRIs (venlafaxine, duloxetine, milnacipran), SSRIs (citalopram, escitalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline) and/or TCAs (clomipramine, amitriptyline, nortriptyline, imipramine). SSRIs were used as secondary treatment for SNRIs and TCAs, TCAs were used as secondary treatment for SSRIs. Clinical outcome was remission, defined as a final HAMD score

Conference/Value in Health Info

2006-10, ISPOR Europe 2006, Copenhagen, Denmark

Value in Health, Vol. 9, No.6 (November/December 2006)

Code

PMH12

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Mental Health

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×