MODELING THE ECONOMIC AND HEALTH CONSEQUENCES OF MANAGING CHRONIC OSTEOARTHRITIS PAIN WITH ORAL OPIOIDS IN GERMANY
Author(s)
Alexandra Ward, BPharm, PhD, Researcher1, Duygu Copur, MSc, MBA, Researcher1, Jochen Fleischmann, Dr, Manager Health Economics & Reimbursement2, Dominique Dubois, MD, Health Economics & Pricing3, Rainer Sabatowski, MD, Department of Anesthesiology4, J. Jaime Caro, MDCM, FRCPC, FAC, President & Scientific Director11Caro Research Institute, Concord, MA, USA; 2 Janssen-Cilag GmbH, Neuss, Germany; 3 Janssen Pharmaceutica, Beerse, Belgium; 4 University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
OBJECTIVES: To estimate the economic implications and health benefits of managing chronic osteoarthritis pain with once-daily OROS® hydromorphone compared with ER oxycodone two or three times a day from the perspective of German statutory health insurance. METHODS: A discrete event simulation was developed to follow a patient for a year from initiating oral opioid treatment. The optimal morphine dose is assigned according to the following base-case conversion ratios: hydromorphone (1:5), oxycodone (1:2). At the end of a dose adjustment period, patients can be satisfied or dissatisfied and stop medication. Pairs of identical patients are created; one receives hydromorphone, the other oxycodone; undergo dose adjustments, may suffer adverse events, recurrence of pain, or discontinue. Dissatisfied patients are prescribed other pain medications, steroid injections or surgery. Utilities are assigned pre-treatment, updated until reaching optimal dose, and when patient is non-compliant or dissatisfied. After one year, the quality-adjusted time and costs are recorded. Distributions of pain relief sleep quality, satisfaction and utilities are from clinical trial data. A pain specialist ensured the simulation reflects the course of managing non-malignant pain with opioids. Direct medical costs are in 2005 Euros. Sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Based on 100 replications of 1,000 patient pairs over one year on a mean daily morphine equivalent dose of 90mg, 14% were dissatisfied. Average time to optimal dose with oxycodone was 7.9 weeks, approximately 3 weeks longer than hydromorphone. Costs per patient were estimated at €1959 with oxycodone vs. €2101 with hydromorphone. Hydromorphone was predicted to increase QALYs by a mean 0.017 years per patient, resulting in ICER = €8343/QALY gained. Sensitivity analyses revealed that results were most sensitive to the conversion ratios, with hydromorphone (1:7.5) being dominant over oxycodone. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these analyses, OROS® hydromorphone is expected to yield health benefits at a reasonable cost in Germany.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2006-10, ISPOR Europe 2006, Copenhagen, Denmark
Value in Health, Vol. 9, No.6 (November/December 2006)
Code
PAR5
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Musculoskeletal Disorders, Systemic Disorders/Conditions
Explore Related HEOR by Topic