LONG-TERM COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF REPAGLINIDE VERSUS NATEGLINIDE IN COMBINATION WITH METFORMIN IN TYPE 2 DIABETES PATIENTS FAILING MONOTHERAPY IN THE SWEDISH SETTING

Author(s)

Joshua Ray, BS, Health Economist1, Ann-Sofie Brandt, BS, Health Economics Manager2, Volker Foos, MSc, Disease Model Programmer1, Vicki Munro, MSc, Head of Health Economics, Europe North3, William J Valentine, PhD, Health Economist1, Stephane Roze, MSc, MHE, Principal1, Andrew J Palmer, MB, BS, Director11CORE - Center for Outcomes Research, A Unit of IMS, Allschwil, Basel, Switzerland; 2 Novo Nordisk Scandinavia AB, Malmo, Sweden; 3 Novo Nordisk Ltd, Crawley, West Sussex, United Kingdom

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the long-term clinical and economic outcomes associated with repaglinide or nateglinide therapy, both in combination with metformin, in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with sulfonylurea or metformin monotherapy, or with low dose glybenclamide plus metformin in the Swedish setting. Based on the results of a recent 16-week clinical trial. METHODS: A published and validated, interactive computer model was adapted to project life expectancy (LE), quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE), cumulative incidence of complications and costs in the Swedish setting. The model comprises a series of Markov sub-models that simulate the long-term incidence and progression of diabetes-related complications based on published data. Baseline cohort characteristics (mean age 55.8 years, duration of diabetes 7 years, HbA1c 8.4%, BMI 33 kg.m-2) and intervention effects were derived from the clinical trial. Costs were accounted from a societal perspective (treatment, complication and lost-productivity costs) and expressed in year 2005 Swedish Kronor (SEK) values. Clinical and cost outcomes were projected over a lifetime horizon and discounted at 3% per annum. RESULTS: Repaglinide+metformin was associated with an increase in LE of 0.21 years (9.82±0.18 versus 9.61±0.17) and in QALE of 0.17 quality-adjusted life years (6.34±0.12 versus 6.17±0.11) compared to nateglinide+metformin. There was a reduced cumulative incidence of diabetes-related complications associated with repaglinide+metformin treatment, most notably for retinopathy and nephropathy, compared to nateglinide+meformin. Lifetime costs were lower for repaglinide+metformin compared to nateglinide+metformin from both a third party payer (SEK 337,897±11,471 versus SEK 380,867±13,226) and societal perspective (SEK 629,525±22,446 versus SEK 647,635±21,191). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with repaglinide+metformin was projected to be associated with increased time free of diabetes-related complications and dominant (cost and life saving) from a societal perspective, compared to nateglinide+metformin, in the Swedish setting.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2006-10, ISPOR Europe 2006, Copenhagen, Denmark

Value in Health, Vol. 9, No.6 (November/December 2006)

Code

PDB11

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×