ECONOMIC ANALYSIS- IBANDRONATE (BONVIVA®) IV INJECTION FOR THE TREATMENT OF POSTMENOPAUSAL OSTEOPOROSIS (PMO) IN THE UK

Author(s)

Warren Cowell, MSc, Health Economist1, Audrey Koay, MBBS, DPhil, Medical Advisor1, Manjit Hunjan, PhD, MBA, MSc, Health Economist21Roche Products Ltd, Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom; 2 GlaxoSmithkline, Middlesex, United Kingdom

OBJECTIVES: Oral bisphosphonate treatment is standard therapy for PMO, but certain patients are unsuitable for this therapy due to intolerance or dosing difficulties. Such patients may receive ‘off-label' unlicensed IV bisphosphonates, typically IV pamidronate in the UK. Ibandronate is the first IV preparation licensed for PMO and this study provides an economic analysis of IV ibandronate in this setting. METHODS: IV ibandronate is administered as a 3mg IV ‘push' lasting 15-30 seconds every 3 months, and priced approximately £27/mg. IV pamidronate (30-60mg) is infused (10-60mg/hour) every 3 months, and priced at approximately £2/mg across the preparations available. A cost-minimisation analysis was undertaken to demonstrate the economic case for IV ibandronate, since based on a review of the clinical evidence base and licensing status, IV ibandronate is assumed to provide at least as much clinical benefit as IV pamidronate. This analysis included referenced NHS costs for drug acquisition and administration (pharmacy preparation, disposables and nurse time required for infusions/IV administration) and compared IV ibandronate to the ‘average' use of IV pamidronate – 45mg infused at 20mg/hour. Due to the range of doses and infusion types used for IV pamidronate, sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Ibandronate is cost-saving on acquisition (£18/patient/year) and particularly on administration (£407/patient/year). The total cost-saving associated with a switch from pamidronate to ibandronate is approximately £425/patient/year and driven primarily by lower administration costs. Under sensitivity analysis, ibandronate remains cost-saving even when the comparator is generic 30mg pamidronate, pamidronate is infused at the maximum rate, or when nurses manage several patients' infusions simultaneously. CONCLUSIONS: Ibandronate IV injection is cost-saving for the NHS compared to IV pamidronate infusion, under a range of realistic scenarios. When this finding is considered alongside IV ibandronate's evidence base and licence for PMO, it is concluded that ibandronate IV injection clearly offers value for money.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2006-10, ISPOR Europe 2006, Copenhagen, Denmark

Value in Health, Vol. 9, No.6 (November/December 2006)

Code

POS6

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Musculoskeletal Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×