THE TREATMENT OF IRON DEFICIENCY/ANAEMIA IN PATIENTS WITH NON-DIALYSIS CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE IN GERMANY – A CLAIMS DATABASE ANALYSIS
Author(s)
Haas JS1, Borchert K1, Krinke K1, Gavata-Steiger S2, Greiner W3, Braun S1
1Xcenda GmbH, Hannover, Germany, 2Vifor Pharma Ltd., Glattbrugg, Switzerland, 3Bielefeld University, School of Public Health, Bielefeld, Germany
OBJECTIVES: Iron deficiency/anaemia (ID/A) has been reported as a frequent comorbidity in non-dialysis chronic kidney disease (ND CKD) and is associated with reduced functional capacity, poor quality of life, and increased mortality. Study aims were to compare health-related outcomes and healthcare costs of ND CKD patients with ID/A and specific iron treatment in Germany. METHODS: A retrospective, matched cohort analysis was conducted. German claims data from the InGef research database containing over 4 million covered lives were used. ND CKD patients stages 3 and 4 with ID/A were identified by ICD-10-GM codes in 2014 with individual pre- and post-index periods of 4 quarters. Incident iron treatment defined the index quarter and was stratified by oral, low dose (<1000mg) and high dose (≥1000mg) intravenous iron based on Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification codes and Pharmacy Central Numbers. A 1:1:1 propensity score matching was performed including the parameters age, gender, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and baseline costs to assess health-related outcomes. RESULTS: In total, n=1,840 ND CKD patients received oral iron, n=150 low dose intravenous, and n=41 high dose intravenous iron with over 90% being treated with Ferric Carboxymaltose. After matching, 37 patients remained in each treatment cohort. Differences were observed concerning all-cause hospitalizations (oral iron vs. high dose intravenous iron (89.2% vs. 78.4%, p=0.227)) and ID/A-related hospitalizations (oral iron vs. low dose intravenous iron (51.4% vs. 24.3%, p=0.027) and oral iron vs. high dose intravenous iron (51.4% vs. 29.7%, p=0.049)). The cost comparison revealed significantly higher average ID/A-related hospitalization costs for the oral iron cohort and lowest costs for the high intravenous iron cohort. The oral iron cohort had the highest observable mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that the use of high dose intravenous iron treatment was associated with the lowest all-cause hospitalization and the highest cost savings, compared to oral and low dose intravenous iron.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2018-11, ISPOR Europe 2018, Barcelona, Spain
Value in Health, Vol. 21, S3 (October 2018)
Code
PUK13
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies
Disease
Urinary/Kidney Disorders