THE CONCORDANCE AND BUDGET IMPACT OF MULTIPLE ER, PR AND HER2 DETERMINATIONS IN DUTCH BREAST CANCER PATIENTS

Author(s)

Berghuis AS1, Koffijberg H1, van Deurzen C2, Sleijfer S2, Terstappen LW1, IJzerman M1
1University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands, 2Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

OBJECTIVES:

The Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor and Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 (ER/PR/HER2) status are essential to guide treatment and provide insight in the prognosis of breast cancer (BC) patients. In many patients, this ER/PR/HER2 status is tested multiple times; on tissue biopsies and tumor resection material. For patients receiving neo-adjuvant therapy or having tumor mutations over time, there might be discrepancies in receptor status between test results. Therefore, this study identifies the discordance and budget impact of multiple ER/PR/HER2 determinations using Dutch individual patient data.

METHODS:

Standardized records of all excerpts (i.e. biopsy or tissue material) of 11,054 BC patients was extracted from the network and registry of histo- and cytopathology in the Netherlands. Discordance in test results was calculated for multiple combinations of the ER/PR/HER2 receptor status. Potential influence of patient- and tumor characteristics on test results and discordance were estimated using multinomial regression.

RESULTS:

Most patients (n=8,881; 80.3%) had records of two excerpts: one from tumor biopsy and one from tumor resection. For 1,691 patients (19.0%), at least one of the receptors (ER/PR/HER2) was determined on both excerpts whilst only for 261 patients (2.9%) all receptors were determined twice. Results were concordant in 183 patients (70.1%) and discordant in 1 patient (0.4%). Remaining patients (n=77; 29.5%) had concordant HER2 test results but differences in the percentages of cells positive for ER/PR. Several patient- and tumor characteristics influence concordance in test results. Total potential cost savings of omitting the second test for patients with concordant test results can be up to €561,230 yearly.

CONCLUSIONS:

Concordance in ER/PR/HER2 test results is high, thereby implying that potential cost-savings of omitting one of the ER/PR/HER2 tests can be substantial. However, to address whether tests indeed can potentially be omitted, treatment decisions and patient outcomes based on these test results should be taken into account.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2018-11, ISPOR Europe 2018, Barcelona, Spain

Value in Health, Vol. 21, S3 (October 2018)

Code

PMD31

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Budget Impact Analysis

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×