REAL-WORLD USE OF PROPHYLACTIC ANTIBIOTICS IN TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY

Author(s)

Lee NR, Kim YJ, Park E, Kang S
National Evidence-based Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea, Republic of (South)

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to present the evidence for the use of prophylactic antibiotics in total knee arthroplasty.

METHODS: To analyze the use of prophylactic antibiotics and occurrence of infections, the retrospective cohort was constructed using health insurance claims data. Following a review of international guidelines, and Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service survey items that evaluated the appropriateness of prophylactic antibiotic treatment, prophylactic antibiotics were defined as 1st through 4th generation cephalosporin, streptomycin, other aminoglycosides, glycopeptide antibacterials, and intravenous antibiotics of the quinolone. To analyze the incidence rate of infections according to the appropriateness use of prophylactic antibiotics, patients were classified as follows: administration of prophylactic antibiotics for two days or less from the start of convalescence during hospitalization for total knee arthroplasty (adherent prophylactic antibiotic group), and administration of prophylactic antibiotics lasting longer than two days (non-adherent prophylactic antibiotic group).

RESULTS: From 2008 to 2016, the total number of insurance claims for the first total knee arthroplasty was 473,034. The average days of antibiotic use per one total knee arthroplasty gradually reduced from 8.87 days in 2008 to 7.79 days in 2016. The analysis results using Cox's proportional hazard model for surgical site infection in all patients showed a nonsignificant difference (HR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.68, 1.12, p=0.27) between the adherent and nonadherent groups. The analysis of subgroups according to age, type of antibiotic, type of medical care institution, and the number of antibiotic administration days per medical care institution also showed a nonsignificant difference in the total number of surgical site infections between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS: Current real-world practice shows that the use of prophylactic antibiotics has gradually reduced and there was no significant difference in surgical site infection between the adherent and nonadherent groups.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2018-11, ISPOR Europe 2018, Barcelona, Spain

Value in Health, Vol. 21, S3 (October 2018)

Code

PMS8

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Epidemiology & Public Health

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy, Safety & Pharmacoepidemiology

Disease

Musculoskeletal Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×