METHODS USED TO VALUE HEALTH RELATED QUALITY IN A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF COST-UTILITY ANALYSES IN HEART FAILURE
Author(s)
Rankin J1, Rowen D2, Howe A1, Cleland JG3, Whitty J1
1Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK, 2University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK, 3Imperial College London, London, UK
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to identify and assess the approaches used to measure and value change in HRQoL in trial-based economic evaluations of heart failure interventions which reported quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) as an outcome. METHODS: Systemic review of trial-based cost-utility analyses of interventions used in heart failure, identified by searching three databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane). RESULTS: Twenty studies reporting economic evaluations based on 18 individual trials were identified. Most studies (n=17) utilised generic preference-based measures to derive QALYs, commonly the EQ-5D-3L. Of these, 3 studies (from the same trial) used mapping from a condition-specific to a generic measure. The remaining 3 studies used patients’ direct evaluation of their own health or physician-reported outcomes to derive QALYs. Only 7 of the 20 studies reported significant incremental QALY gains. Most interventions were reported as being likely to be cost-effective at specified willingness to pay thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: The substantial variation in the approach applied to derive QALYs in the measurement of and value attributed to HRQoL in heart failure requires further investigation as generic preference-based measures may not be sensitive to such changes. Heart failure condition-specific, preference-based measures may be more appropriate.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2018-11, ISPOR Europe 2018, Barcelona, Spain
Value in Health, Vol. 21, S3 (October 2018)
Code
PRM190
Topic
Methodological & Statistical Research
Topic Subcategory
PRO & Related Methods
Disease
Cardiovascular Disorders