Author(s)
Ballesteros J1, Meca-Lallana V2, Brañas M3, Higueras Y4, Candeliere-Merlicco A5, Carrascal P6, Rodríguez-De la Fuente O7, Salas E3, Amoros C3, Maurino J8
1University of Basque Country, Leioa, Spain, 2Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Madrid, Spain, 3Roche Farma, Madrid, Spain, 4Fundación de Investigación Biomédica del Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain, 5Hospital Rafael Méndez, Lorca, Spain, 6Esclerosis Múltiple España, Madrid, Spain, 7Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain, 8Roche Farma Medical Department, Madrid, Spain
OBJECTIVES: Fatigue in multiple sclerosis (MS) is a key symptom associated with work-related problems and poor quality of life outcomes. The 5-item Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS-5) is a brief self-assessment tool for measuring the impact of fatigue on cognitive, physical and psychosocial function. However, limited information is available on the psychometric performance of the MFIS-5 in patients with MS. The aim of this study was to assess the factor structure and construct validity of the MFIS-5 in the management of MS. METHODS: A multicenter, non-interventional, cross-sectional study in adult patients with MS (McDonald 2010 criteria) was conducted. A non-parametric item response theory (IRT) procedure, Mokken analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were performed to assess the factor structure of the MFIS-5. A graded response model (GRM or Samejima’s model) was conducted to determine items characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 302 patients were studied (mean age = 42.3 ± 10 years, 64.2% female, 90.4% with relapsing-remitting MS). Mean Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score: 2.6 ± 1.9. The Mokken analysis found the MFIS-5 is a strong one-dimensional scale (overall scalability index H = 0.67) with high reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.90). The CFA model confirmed the one-dimensional structure (Comparative fit index = 1.0, RMSEA = 0.035). Samejima’s model fitted well an unconstrained model with different item difficulties. The item characteristic curve showed all items presented appropriate shape and difficulty parameters. Items #2 (“limited to do things away from home”), #3 (“had trouble maintaining physical effort for long periods”), and #4 (“less able to complete tasks requiring physical effort”) represent 80.4% of the total information. CONCLUSIONS: The MFIS-5 shows appropriate psychometric characteristics as a patient-reported outcome. MFIS-5 may constitute a valuable and easy-to-implement addition to measure the impact of fatigue in patients with MS in clinical practice.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2018-11, ISPOR Europe 2018, Barcelona, Spain
Value in Health, Vol. 21, S3 (October 2018)
Code
PND135
Topic
Patient-Centered Research
Topic Subcategory
Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes
Disease
Neurological Disorders