EVOLUTION OF ONCOLYTICS CONSUMPTION IN PORTUGAL OVER TEN YEARS

Author(s)

Ramos C1, Moreira A2, Furtado C3, Alves da Costa F4
1National Oncology Registry (RON), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Lisbon Francisco Gentil (IPOLFG), Lisbon, Portugal, 2Instituto Português de Oncologia, Lisboa, Portugal, 3National Authority of Medicines and Health Products, I.P. (INFARMED), Lisbon, Portugal, 4Portuguese National Oncology Register, Lisboa, Portugal

OBJECTIVES: To analyse time trends in oncology treatment over the last ten years in Portugal, ascertaining the contribution of oral treatments.

METHODS: A descriptive study characterized the evolution of drug consumption between 2008-2017 resorting to data from the National Authority of Medicines and Health Products, I.P, reported by publicly administered hospital pharmacies (n=45). Analysis focused on overall time trends, by administration route and pharmacotherapy classification subgroup (CFT).

RESULTS: In Portugal, 30% of oncologic therapy used in the last decade were orally administered; with median annual proportions varying significantly by CFT (23% immunomodulators, 30% cytotoxic, 45% hormonotherapy; p<0.001). Globally, the median annual costs of oral therapy were inferior to non-oral therapy (€80710171 vs €149984413; p<0.001); the same was observed within the immunotherapy group (€11702130 vs €90746951; p<0.001); restricting to cytotoxic agents, the reverse was identified (€63323381 vs €42582322; p<0.001). Both the quantities and costs of oral therapy have been annually steadily increasing, at a higher rate than non-oral medication (median unit increase: 4.1% vs 2.0%, p=0.05; median value increase: 4.2% vs 3.0%, p>0.05). The annual increases were more marked in the cytotoxic group, in median units (106.3% vs 10.3%; p<0.001) and median values (122.6% vs 8.5%; p=0.001). A similar trend was visible in the immunotherapy group, in median units (297.3% vs 9.0%; p>0.05) and median values (283.6% vs 0.0%; p=0.026). Focusing on the evolution of oral therapies only, the sharper increase was observed for immunotherapy followed by cytotoxic, both in units (297.3% vs 106.3% vs -5.4%; p=0.009) and in value (283.6% vs 122.6% vs -7.7%); p=0.001), although we should acknowledge some substances contribute heavily in the cytotoxic group.

CONCLUSIONS: Data suggests increasing use of oral therapies, reaching 37% in 2017. Oral therapy contributes to patient autonomy, creating a need for restructuring of healthcare services to assist people managing adverse events and medication adherence from home.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2018-11, ISPOR Europe 2018, Barcelona, Spain

Value in Health, Vol. 21, S3 (October 2018)

Code

PCN246

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Health Service Delivery & Process of Care

Topic Subcategory

Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies, Prescribing Behavior, Quality of Care Measurement, Treatment Patterns and Guidelines

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×