ESTIMATING THE PREVALENCE, AND DESCRIBING THE MEDICAL HISTORY AND TREATMENT PATTERNS OF PATIENTS WITH NON-RADIOGRAPHIC AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS IN GERMANY – AN APPROACH USING A CLAIMS DATABASE
Author(s)
König C1, Borchert K1, Meise D1, Braun S1, Meier F2, Tian H3, Boehm K4, von Hinüber U5
1Xcenda GmbH, Hannover, Germany, 2Wilhelm Loehe University of Applied Sciences, Fürth, Germany, 3Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA, 4Novartis Pharma GmbH, Nürnberg, Germany, 5Rheumapraxis Hildesheim, Hildesheim, Germany
OBJECTIVES: To apply an algorithm to identify possible non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) patients in a German claims database, to estimate the prevalence, and describe the medical history, and biologic treatment patterns in these patients. METHODS: A retrospective claims data analysis was conducted using the “Institut für angewandte Gesundheitsforschung” database containing anonymized German healthcare claims of about 4 million insured individuals. Patients with a diagnosis of other inflammatory spondylopathy based on the German ICD-10-GM code (M46.-) in 2013 (index quarter) and a history of back pain (M54.-) or disc disorders (M50.- to M53.-) and no diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) (M45.-) in the individual four years pre-index period were identified as nr-axSpA patients. The diagnostic prevalence, progression rate to AS in the individual one year post-index period, medical history of patients within the four years pre-index period, and usage of biologics in a subgroup (n=852) observable for two years post-index were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 869 nr-axSpA patients (female: 64%, mean age: 58 years) were identified in the database, resulting in a 2013 prevalence of 26.2 per 100,000 persons in Germany. In the pre-index period, all patients visited outpatient physicians, which included radiologists (84% of patients), orthopedists (77%), dermatologists (53%), and rheumatologists (52%). More than two-thirds of the patients (71%) had at least one MRI or X-ray assessment during this period. About 13% of the nr-axSpA patients progressed to AS during the post-index period. Among the subgroup of 852 patients, 51 (6%) patients were prescribed with biologics. CONCLUSIONS: Although differentiation between nr-axSpA and AS is difficult, the algorithm used in this study allowed the identification of possible nr-axSpA patients in claims database. Contrary to expectations, rheumatologists were not the most frequently visited physicians by nr-axSpA patients. Additional studies would greatly benefit from the establishment of a separate ICD-10-GM code for nr-axSpA in Germany.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2018-11, ISPOR Europe 2018, Barcelona, Spain
Value in Health, Vol. 21, S3 (October 2018)
Code
PMS11
Topic
Epidemiology & Public Health
Topic Subcategory
Safety & Pharmacoepidemiology
Disease
Musculoskeletal Disorders