ESTIMATED COST SAVINGS FROM DOSE BANDING GUIDANCE- A CASE STUDY USING TREATMENTS FOR STAGE IV MELANOMA

Author(s)

Willis A1, Bullement A2, Sullivan W1
1BresMed Health Solutions, Sheffield, UK, 2BresMed Health Solutions, Nottingham, NTT, UK

OBJECTIVES

:
Systemic anti-cancer therapies (SACTs) are commonly dosed according to patient body surface area (BSA) or weight. Recent National Health Service England (NHSE) guidance encourages hospitals to use dose banding, wherein individualised doses are rounded up or down to predetermined standard doses. Dose banding is expected to lead to reduced wastage and administration time. This study aimed to estimate per-patient annual drug and administration costs for Stage IV melanoma treatments for which dose-banding guidance is available, and compare these costs to when dose banding is not considered.

METHODS

:
A log-normal distribution was fitted to Health Survey for England weight and BSA data to calculate the proportion of patients requiring each number of vials. Dose-banding guidance is available for dacarbazine, ipilimumab and pembrolizumab. Three costing methods were explored and compared: (1) non-banded dosing assuming individual preparation, (2) banded dosing assuming individual preparation, and (3) exact dose (i.e. no drug wastage due to preparation for the population). List prices were used in all analyses. Administration efficiency savings were incorporated, based on published NHSE evidence.

RESULTS

:
For ipilimumab and pembrolizumab, dose banding resulted in annual respective drug costs savings of 6.4% (-£4,581) and 9.1% (-£3,143) versus no banding. For dacarbazine, dose banding led to a 0.3% increase in annual drug costs (+£0.89). Assuming no wastage led to savings of 3.9%-15.6% across the regimens considered. Estimated annual cost savings due to reduced administration time ranged from £329 to £528, dependent on administration frequency.

CONCLUSIONS

:
While assuming no wastage may be unrealistic within routine NHSE practice, the results of this analysis demonstrate the potential cost savings possible with dose banding, due to similar or lower drug costs and reduced administration time. Economic evaluations incorporating the costs of SACTs should include scenarios with dose banding where relevant.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2018-11, ISPOR Europe 2018, Barcelona, Spain

Value in Health, Vol. 21, S3 (October 2018)

Code

PRM133

Topic

Methodological & Statistical Research

Topic Subcategory

Modeling and simulation

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×