DEVELOPMENT OF A METHODOLOGY FOR CONSTRUCTING MODELS FOR EVALUATING THE ACADEMIC VALUE OF MEDICAL CENTERS

Author(s)

Hod R1, Maimon O2, Zimlichman E3
1Tel Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, TA, Israel, 2Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel, 3Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel

OBJECTIVES:

Academic Medical Caters (AMCs) have a public vocation, simultaneously serving two different purposes: Delivery of patient care as the main mission, supported by a variety of academic activities, while assuring high quality healthcare services and meeting budget targets.

Since the literature showed that no model measuring AMCs academic quality was introduced, this study aim was to develop a methodology for constructing models evaluating the academic quality provided by AMCs.

METHODS

:
In 2016 a list of AMCs' academic quality indicators (AQIs) was drafted, using a literature review and consulting scholars. Afterwards, additional data and preferences were collected by conducting semi-structured interviews with academic content experts and executives, at a metropolitan, 1,500-bed AMC.

The study was complemented by a three-round Delphi panel, with the participation of practiced educators and researchers, academic experts, faculty members and executives. Finally, utilizing a composite indicator method on the meaningful AQIs, a new methodology for developing an academic quality evaluation model for AMCs was constructed.

RESULTS:

Thirty five content experts were involved in developing that methodology, consisting of the following nine AQIs (relative weight in parentheses): 'Paper's quality' (18.6%), 'Completed studies' (13.6%), 'Author's quality' (13.1%), 'Resident's quality' (11.4%), 'Competitive grants funding' (10.1%), 'Academic Training' (8.6%), 'Academic degree' (8.5%), 'Number of' studies' (8.3%), and 'Academic supervision' (7.8%). These AQIs were grouped into three core categories: 'Education', 'Research' and 'Publications', having almost the same importance (0.363, 0.320, and 0.317, respectively). The results demonstrated a high level of internal consistency (Cronbach-alpha range: .79 – .86).

CONCLUSIONS:

To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first systematic study exploring AMCs' academic value. The main contribution of this research is a reliable methodology for constructing evaluation models for AMCs' academic performance. In practice, the proposed methodology will be implemented as a managerial measurement tool, benchmarking the academic values of the studied AMC wards.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2018-11, ISPOR Europe 2018, Barcelona, Spain

Value in Health, Vol. 21, S3 (October 2018)

Code

PRM153

Topic

Methodological & Statistical Research, Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Confounding, Selection Bias Correction, Causal Inference, Modeling and simulation, PRO & Related Methods

Disease

Multiple Diseases

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×