COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF TERIFLUNOMIDE FOR THE TREATMENT OF RELAPSING-REMITTING MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS IN GREECE
Author(s)
Gourzoulidis G1, Kourlaba G1, Andreadou E2, Karageorgiou K3, Maniadakis N1
1National School of Public Health, Athens, Greece, 21st Department of Neurology, Athens National and Kapodistrian University, “Aeginition” Hospital, Athens, Greece, 3Neurology Department, Athens Medical Center, Athens, Greece
OBJECTIVES: To assess the cost-effectiveness of teriflunomide (TERI) compared to alternative disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) in Greece. METHODS: A Markov model was used to access cost-effectiveness of TERI compared to peginterferon beta-1a (PEG-INF), interferon-beta-1b 250 µg (INF-b) dimethyl fumarate (DMF), fingolimod (FIN), glatiramer acetate (GA), interferon-beta-1a 30 µg (INF-1a-30) interferon-beta-1a 22 µg (INF-1a-22) and 44 µg (INF-1a-44) in RRMS patients from a third-party payer perspective over a lifetime horizon.Efficacy, safety data, and utility values were extracted from published studies. The direct medical costs (€2017) considered in the model includes drug acquisition and administration, disease management per EDSS state, relapse management, adverse events management, and monitoring of patients. Primary outcomes were patient quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost per QALY gained (ICER).Costs and outcomes were discounted at 3.5% per annum.A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was conducted. RESULTS: Over a lifetime horizon, the total cost for TERI was €100,668 and for comparators ranged from €91,163 (PEG-INF) to €141,094 (FIN). In terms of health outcomes, TERI gained 6.48 QALYs, while, QALYs for comparators ranging from 6.12 (INF-1b) to 6.56 (DMF). The incremental analysis showed that TERI dominates INF-1a-22 and was a cost-effective option over INF-1a-44 (ICER: €44,395), IFN-1a-30 (ICER: €20,847), INF-1b (ICER: €8,246), and GA (ICER: €16,930) under the threshold of €51,000 per QALY gained. TERI was a more expensive treatment option compared to PEG-INF (€9,505) and cost-saving option over FIN (-€40,426) while these three treatment options were similar in terms of QALYs. Compared to DMF, teriflunomide was associated with lower total costs and marginally lower QALYs, resulting in an ICER of €127,322.A probabilistic sensitivity analysis confirmed the deterministic results. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis suggests that TERI was estimated to be a cost-effective option compared to alternative DMTs in the treatment of adult patients with RRMS in Greece.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2018-11, ISPOR Europe 2018, Barcelona, Spain
Value in Health, Vol. 21, S3 (October 2018)
Code
PND60
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Neurological Disorders