COMPARISON OF PATIENT ACTIVATION LEVELS ACROSS VARIOUS CONDITIONS IN THE US AND EU5

Author(s)

Annunziata K1, Sternbach N2, Carpinella CM3, Chapnick J4, Patel P5, McDonald M6, McElwee N7
1KANTAR HEALTH, NEW YORK CITY, NY, USA, 2Kantar Health, New York City, NY, USA, 3Kantar Health, San Mateo, CA, USA, 4Kantar Health, Horsham, PA, USA, 5Kantar Health, New York, NY, USA, 6Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA, 7inVentivHealth, Manchester, MA, USA

OBJECTIVES: Patient activation is the knowledge, skill, and confidence people have in managing their health. This study describes patient activation levels across various conditions in the US and EU5.

METHODS: Descriptive analyses were conducted using data from the 2017 US (n=75,004) and EU5 (n=62,000; France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and UK) Kantar Health PaCeR (patient-centered research) platform. Adults age 18 and over were surveyed using a stratified random sampling approach to ensure representativeness to the adult population. Patients were included if they self-reported a physician diagnosis of type 2 diabetes (T2D), depression, chronic pain, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), sleep conditions, hepatitis C, nasal allergies/hay fever, or psoriasis. The Patient Activation Measure® or PAM® consists of four activation levels. Level 1 or “disengaged and overwhelmed” indicates the lowest activation while level 4 or “maintaining behaviors and pushing further” indicates the highest activation.

RESULTS: Patient activation levels differed across conditions and geographic regions. In the US, the highest level of patient activation was observed among patients with hepatitis C (33%), RA (32%), or nasal allergies/hay fever (31%); whereas in the EU5 the highest activation was seen among patients with T2D, hepatitis C, or RA (18% each). Across all conditions, in the US there was a significantly greater proportion of highly activated patients (level 4; ranging from 25% to 33%) compared with the EU5 (14% to 18%). Conversely, at the lowest level of patient activation (level 1), the portion of patients was similar across the regions (range 5% to 10%). At higher activation levels, there was a greater proportion of patients at higher education and income levels and patients were older and female.

CONCLUSIONS: These differences in activation by condition and region can inform messaging and interventions aimed to progress patients from one activation level to the next.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2018-11, ISPOR Europe 2018, Barcelona, Spain

Value in Health, Vol. 21, S3 (October 2018)

Code

PDB128

Topic

Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes

Disease

Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders, Mental Health, Musculoskeletal Disorders, Systemic Disorders/Conditions

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×