CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES IN CLINICAL NUTRITION IN ONCOLOGY- AVAILABLE EVIDENCE, REAL WORLD PRACTICES, AND THE WAY FORWARD

Author(s)

Goldwasser F1, Piaggio T2, Lucas J3, Zalcman G4, Tilleul P5, Schiefke I6, Marschal O7, Pedrazzoli P8, Caccialanza R9
1Medical Oncology, Cochin Hospital, AP-HP, University Paris-Descartes, Paris, France, 2Baxter Healthcare SA, Zürich, Switzerland, 3Real World Insights, IQVIA, Basel, Switzerland, 4Thoracic Oncology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, AP-HP, University Paris-Diderot, Paris, France, 5Pharmacy Department, Pitié Salpetrière APHP/Paris Sorbonne University of Pharmacy, Paris, France, 6Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Diabetologie und Endokrinologie, Klinikum St Georg gGmbH, Leipzig, Germany, 7Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis, Dres. M. Adler, O. Marschal, A. Pies, N. Stapenhorst und S. Wöhle, Braunschweig, Germany, 8Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS, Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy, 9Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy

OBJECTIVES: Malnutrition (MN) in cancer patients is associated with poorer clinical outcomes. Here we demonstrate benefits of timely nutritional therapy based on amalgamated real-world data that informs treatment optimization.

METHODS: We analyzed data from three observational, retrospective studies that used administrative healthcare data to investigate diagnosis of malnutrition and use of nutritional therapy in cancer patients in France (N=644,720), Italy (N=58,468) and Germany (N=4,642) to highlight the clinical benefits of clinical nutrition in oncology. Methods included descriptive statistic, propensity score matched analysis to compare length and frequency of hospitalizations in France in patients with early, late, and no MN diagnosis during hospitalization, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

RESULTS: Despite ESPEN recommendations for routine screening, MN diagnoses rates are much lower than anticipated based on literature indicating rates of 40-60% (10% at first hospitalization in France). Nutritional therapy remains under-utilized (i.e. in only 50% of patients with cachexia in Germany) even if clearly indicated. Data from Italy and Germany shows that nutritional therapy is often initiated as an end-of-life measure 3 to 4 months before death. Results from France indicate that early MN diagnosis (i.e. at first, compared to after first cancer hospitalization) is associated with a ~45% lower frequency of cancer hospitalizations and a reduced length-of-stay (-25%) during follow-up. Data from Italy indicates a survival advantage of over 3 months among patients with and without metastatic disease, whose malnutrition was diagnosed and treated early.

CONCLUSIONS: Our analyses indicate that MN diagnosis and use of nutritional therapy remains low and sub-optimal. Our results, notwithstanding limitations of administrative retrospective data, provide indication that early use of clinical nutrition may help to improve patients’ outcomes and optimize use of health care resources. Improving malnutrition diagnosis and generating evidence to confirm benefits of clinical nutrition using detailed clinical data are immediate priorities in oncology.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2018-11, ISPOR Europe 2018, Barcelona, Spain

Value in Health, Vol. 21, S3 (October 2018)

Code

PCN327

Topic

Health Service Delivery & Process of Care

Topic Subcategory

Prescribing Behavior, Treatment Patterns and Guidelines

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×