ASSOCIATION OF ADHERENCE AND TREATMENT INTENSITY WITH CARDIOVASCULAR OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS WITH ATHEROSCLEROSIS OR OTHER CARDIOVASCULAR RISK FACTORS TREATED WITH STATINS AND/OR EZETIMIBE

Author(s)

Khunti K1, Danese M2, Kutikova L3, Catterick D4, Gleeson M2, Seshasai SR5, Brownrigg J6, Ray KK7
1University of Leicester, Leicester, UK, 2Outcomes Insights, Inc., Westlake Village, CA, USA, 3Amgen (Europe) GmbH, Zug, Switzerland, 4Amgen Limited, Uxbridge, UK, 5St George’s, University of London, London, UK, 6St George's, University of London, London, UK, 7Imperial College London, London, UK

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of adherence and treatment intensity on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with documented cardiovascular disease (CVD), type 2 diabetes without CVD (diabetes), and stage 4-5 chronic kidney disease without CVD (CKD).

METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. We included patients aged ≥18 years with hypercholesterolemia (≥2 statin and/or ezetimibe prescriptions) from 2010 to 2013. We followed them until death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, ischemic stroke, heart failure, revascularization, or February 2016. Adherence was assessed annually using the proportion of days covered (PDC) with “adherent” defined as a PDC ≥80%. Treatment intensity was classified according to guidelines based on expected percent LDL-cholesterol reduction as low (<30% reduction), moderate (30%-50% reduction), or high (>50% reduction). Adherence and treatment intensity were multiplied to create a combined measure reflecting treatment intensity after accounting for adherence.

RESULTS: There were 16,701 CVD patients, 12,422 diabetes patients, and 674 CKD patients. In the CVD cohort, high intensity therapy patients were more likely to be adherent over time (84-72%) than low intensity (57-44%). The hazard ratio (HR) for adherent versus untreated patients was 0.65 (95% CI 0.60-0.70). The HR for high intensity versus untreated patients was 0.60 (95% CI 0.52-0.68). Using the combined measure, adherent patients receiving a high intensity regimen had a 34% lower cardiovascular event risk (HR: 0.66, 95% CI 0.56-0.78) than non-adherent patients receiving a low intensity regimen. The diabetic subgroup and the subgroup with multiple cardiovascular events had larger risk reductions. Diabetes and CKD cohort findings were similar.

CONCLUSIONS: Both high intensity and high adherence were associated with lower risk, and lower adherence and lower intensity were associated with higher risk. Patient education, improved adherence to treatment guidelines, and new therapeutic options that improve intensity and adherence should help to reduce cardiovascular risk.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2018-11, ISPOR Europe 2018, Barcelona, Spain

Value in Health, Vol. 21, S3 (October 2018)

Code

AD1

Topic

Clinical Outcomes

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy

Disease

Cardiovascular Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×