A FLEXIBLE OPEN-SOURCE COST-EFFECTIVENESS MODEL FOR METASTATIC EGFR+ NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER

Author(s)

Jansen JP1, Incerti D1, Shafrin J1, Frederickson A2, Lakdawalla DN3, Reckamp KL4
1Innovation and Value Initiative, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2Precision Xtract, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 3University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 4City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA

OBJECTIVES: The Open-Source Value Project (OSVP) promotes and facilitates an open-source, collaborative, and iterative approach to cost-effectiveness model development. We are presenting the next OSVP model, which can be used to estimate the value of alternative sequential treatment strategies (1L -> 2L -> 2L+) for metastatic EGFR+ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS: The flexible open-source simulation model, accessible to both technical and non-technical end-users, enables a more constructive dialogue between stakeholders (e.g. patients, payers, providers, and manufacturers) with different beliefs about relevant clinical data, modeling approaches, and value perspective. To facilitate transparency, debate and collaboration among diverse stakeholders, the model consists of the following components: Modifiable R and C++ source code available in a GitHub repository; an R-package to run the model for custom analyses; a web-based user interface for full control over the model without the need to be well-versed in the programming language; and a general audience web-application allowing those who are not experts in modeling or health economics to interact with the model, and contribute to the discussion of value assessment. Model input parameters were estimated based on currently available evidence, synthesized with Bayesian meta-analysis techniques.

RESULTS: The model was used to evaluate the impact of uncertainty in clinical evidence, multiple competing model structures, decision framework of choice (i.e. cost-effectiveness analysis or multi-criteria decision analysis), and perspective (healthcare or limited societal) on estimates of value for currently recommended treatment sequences for patients with metastatic EGFR+ NSCLC.

CONCLUSIONS: In order for a cost-effectiveness model to remain relevant over time it needs to evolve along with the clinical evidence and scientific insights. The OSVP EGFR+ NSCLC facilitates iterative development and collaboration between multiple clinical and methodological experts with the ultimate aim of having a transparent model useful and acceptable for many stakeholders.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2018-11, ISPOR Europe 2018, Barcelona, Spain

Value in Health, Vol. 21, S3 (October 2018)

Code

PCN169

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×