MEDICAL COSTS AND HOSPTALIZATION OF ADULTS DIAGNOSED WITH ATTENTION-DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER WHO RECEIVED ALTERNATIVE THERAPIES

Author(s)

Eric Wu, PhD, Manager1, Howard Birnbaum, PhD, Vice President1, Huabin Zhang, MD, MPH, Associate Director2, Jasmina Radeva, MA, Associate1, Elaine Yang, PhD, Senior Analyst1, Adam Castor, MA, Analyst11Analysis Group, Inc, Boston, MA, USA; 2 McNeil Consumer & Specialty Pharmaceuticals, Fort Washington, PA, USA

OBJECTIVES: To compare 6-month medical costs and hospitalization risk of adults diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) receiving extended-release methylphenidate (OROS-MPH, CONCERTA®) to those receiving mixed amphetamine salts extended release (MAS-XR, Adderall XR®) or atomoxetine (Strattera®) from employer perspective. METHODS: We examined data from a U.S. employer claims database of 5 million beneficiaries (1999-2004). Analysis was restricted to adults aged 18-64 with at least one diagnosis of ADHD (ICD-9: 314.x) and at least one prescription of OROS-MPH, MAS-XR, or atomoxetine. Adults were required to have continuous eligibility 6 months before and after their latest therapy initiation and have no ADHD therapy in the prior 6 months. Descriptive measures of medical costs (including outpatient and inpatient costs) and hospitalization risk were computed over 6 months following therapy initiation. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) models were used to compare costs of adults receiving alternative therapies adjusting for baseline demographic characteristics, substance abuse, depression, and the Charlson comorbidity index. Costs were adjusted to 2004 dollars using medical CPI. RESULTS: Of the research sample (n=4569), 31.8% received OROS-MPH, 34.0% MAS-XR, and 34.2% atomoxetine. In the 6-month follow-up period, medical costs were $1251 for OROS-MPH, $1422 for MAS-XR, and $1581 for atomoxetine-treated adults. The GEE model adjusting for patient characteristics found that 6-month medical costs for OROS-MPH-treated adults were $141 less than for the MAS-XR-treated (p=0.02) and $132 less than for the atomoxetine-treated (p=0.03). The risk of having at least one hospitalization was 42% higher for adults treated with MAS-XR (OR=1.42, 95% CI: 0.99-2.05) and 51% higher for adults treated with atomoxetine (OR=1.51, 95% CI: 1.05-2.17) compared to adults treated with OROS-MPH. CONCLUSIONS: Over the 6-month period after therapy initiation, adults treated with OROS-MPH had lower medical costs than those treated with MAS-XR and lower medical costs and risk of hospitalization than adults treated with atomoxetine.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2006-05, ISPOR 2006, Philadelphia, PA

Value in Health, Vol. 9, No.3 (May/June 2006)

Code

MH4

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Mental Health, Reproductive and Sexual Health

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×