BASAL BOLUS THERAPY AMONG TYPE 1 DIABETES PATIENTS- A COMPARATIVE COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF ANALOG- AND HUMAN-BASED INSULIN REGIMENS
Author(s)
David Cobden, MPH, MSc, Health Economic Analyst1, William Valentine, PhD, Medical Writer2, Andrew Palmer, MD, Medical Director, CEO2, Stephane Roze, MSc, Director21Novo Nordisk Inc, Princeton, NJ, USA; 2 CORE - Center for Outcomes Research, Binningen, Basel, Switzerland
OBJECTIVES: To provide an estimate of the clinical and economic outcomes of long-term use of either all analog (insulin detemir (IDet) + aspart (IAsp)) or all human (NPH + human soluble insulin (HSI)) basal bolus regimens among type 1 diabetes patients. METHODS: Comparative efficacy data was obtained from a recent 18-week randomized controlled trial (n=595) which demonstrated statistically significant benefits in glycemic control (HbA1c: -0.22%, p<0.001; PPG excursions: p<0.001), risk for hypoglycemia (all: 21% lower, p=0.036; 26.9 vs. 34.6 events per patient year; nocturnal: 55% lower, p<0.001), and weight gain (-1.01 kg, p<0.001) in favor of analogs. Subjects were 63% male, aged 39.1 years, and had a mean baseline HbA1c of 8.38% (duration of diabetes: 15.3 (10.3) years). A published, peer-reviewed and validated model of type 1 diabetes was used to make long-term projections, using second order Monte Carlo methodology, to evaluate life expectancy, quality-adjusted life expectancy, cumulative incidence of complications, and direct medical costs (pharmacy plus complication costs). Base case time horizon was 35 years. Future costs and clinical benefits were discounted at 3% annually. Sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: Treatment with IDet+IAsp was projected to increase life expectancy (0.168 years), QALE (0.698 QALYs), and reduce cumulative incidences of diabetes-related comorbidities (cardiovascular, renal, and ocular disease) versus NPH+HSI. Direct medical costs were higher in the IDet+IAsp group, leading to an ICER of $14,974 per QALY gained. One-way sensitivity analysis of pharmacy costs (±15%), discount rate (0-6%), complication costs, and duration of treatment effect on HbA1c (<5 years) support the robustness of these findings. CONCLUSION: Patients with type 1 diabetes who require basal bolus therapy may benefit from analog insulin treatment in comparison to human insulin. Long-term therapy was projected to improve life expectancy, quality-adjusted life expectancy, and complication rates, representing good value for money according to commonly supported standards.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2006-05, ISPOR 2006, Philadelphia, PA
Value in Health, Vol. 9, No.3 (May/June 2006)
Code
PDB16
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders