SYSTEMATIC REVIEW ON THE SHARE OF ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY COST IN RELATION OVERALL DIRECT TREAMENT COSTS OF MOST FREQUENT NOSOCOMIAL AND COMMUNITY ACQUIRED INFECTIONS IN ADULTS

Author(s)

Dietrich ES1, Mielke A2, Saalbach KP3, Frank U41National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians, Berlin, AK, Germany; 2 Federal Institute for drugs and Medical Devices, Bonn, Germany; 3 Omnicare, Gütersloh, Germany; 4 Institute of Environmental Medicine and Hospital Epidemiology, Freiburg, Germany

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the share of antibiotic therapy cost in total treatment costs for nosocomial and community acquired infections. METHODS: Systematic literature search (1996-2003) using the major online databases and additional manual search yielded 1211 references (selection Ia). Studies were divided up to 11 different diagnostic groups that were considered to be most relevant (selection Ib). Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied for the selection Ic. Study quality was assessed with a consolidated quality score comprising 23 questions. A study was assessed as 'qualified‘ for further analyses, if at least 50% of maximum points were achieved in a review conducted by two independent reviewers. This resulted in the selection of 44 studies (selection II) that were subject to a detailed metaanalysis. RESULTS: The percentage of antibiotic costs in relation to total direct costs was low: nosocomial pneumonia (N=3, 1.4-13.7%, SD: 5.5), respiratory tract infections (N=2, 10-24.8%, SD: 5.3), community acquired pneumonia (N=14, 0.64-57.84%, SD: 24.65), chronic bronchitis (N=6, 1.1- 66.66%, SD: 17.19), urinary tract infection (N=3,5-33.82%, SD: 14.85), intraabdominal infection (N=2, 3.2-19.38%, SD: 5.26), surgical prophylaxis (N=2, 0.1-83.8%, SD: 33,02), otolaryngological infections (N=4, 14.18-60.1%), STD (N=1, 0.15-3.3%, SD: 2.23), Helicobacter pylori infections (N=3, 2.34-45.49%, SD: 16.36), Clostridium difficile infections (N=3, 0.07-1.20%, SD: 0.51). CONCLUSIONS: This review showed that costs of antibiotic treatment were low compared to overall direct treatment costs for most frequent infections regardless of the differences in design and quality of studies. The experience from this review may also contribute to further development of evidence-based guidelines for conducting pharmacoeconomical studies.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2005-11, ISPOR Europe 2005, Florence, Italy

Value in Health, Vol. 8, No.6 (November/December 2005)

Code

PIN13

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies

Disease

Gastrointestinal Disorders, Infectious Disease (non-vaccine), Respiratory-Related Disorders, Sensory System Disorders, Urinary/Kidney Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×