PHARMACOECONOMIC COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO DRUG STRATEGIES OF TREATMENT OF ANXIETY DISORDERS- HOMEOPATHY AND PSYCHOTROPICS

Author(s)

Trichard M1, Chaufferin G1, Nicoloyannis N2, 1Laboratoires Boiron, Sainte-Foy-Lès-Lyon, France; 2Université Lumière Lyon 2, Bron, France

OBJECTIVES: To compare "homeopathic drugs" strategy (strategy H) with "psychotropic drugs" strategy (strategy P) for treating anxiety disorders in France, in terms of effectiveness, satisfaction, and costs. METHODS: Effectiveness, satisfaction, and economic data were derived from a 3-month pragmatic prospective study including 394 patients which were "male or female over 18, who consulted a homeopathic or non-homeopathic GP for the first time for symptoms of anxiety disorders such as defined by the DSM IV". Strategy H included 135 patients that received at least one homeopathic drug and no psychotropic drugs, and strategy P 185 patients that received at least one psychotropic drug and no homeopathic drugs. In both strategies, other drugs could have been prescribed (trace elements, etc). Effectiveness was assessed by GPs using the "Hamilton Anxiety Scale", and by patients using the "Spielberger State Trait Anxiety Inventory". Satisfaction of GPs and patients was evaluated using the "Likert Scale". Direct medical costs (medical visits, medication, additional tests) were assessed from the national health insurance system viewpoint, using public prices and French Social Security tariffs. We checked the comparability of patient population and performed appropriate statistical tests: Chi-Square test for qualitative variables, and Student, Mann-Whitney, Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests for quantitative variables. RESULTS: The "homeopathic drugs" strategy was statistically equivalent to the "psychotropic drugs" strategy in terms of effectiveness (absolute variation of Hamilton score: 13.11 vs 13.02, absolute variation of Spielberger Ya and Yb scores: 14.85 vs 18.65 and 10.41 vs 13.28 respectively) and satisfaction (no statistical differences), for significantly lower direct medical costs reimbursed by the national health insurance system (53.46€ vs 65.75€). CONCLUSION: Homeopathic drugs could constitute a cost-effective alternative to psychotropic drugs for treating anxiety disorders, and so could provide an answer to public health and economic problems posed by these drugs in France.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2003-05, ISPOR 2003, Arlington, VA, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 6, No. 3 (May/June 2003)

Code

PMH23

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Mental Health

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×