SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF PROSTATE CANCER SCREENING GUIDELINE IN VARIOUS COUNTRY

Author(s)

Romyen C
Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand

OBJECTIVES

:
Prostate cancer is one of the most burden disease in menAs the evidence and recommendation of screening is still conflicting among various countriesWe conduct the systematic review to explore the major prostate cancer screening guideline around the world to provide the information to assist decision makers in technology assessment

METHODS

:
Systematic review was conducted to explore up-to-date prostate cancer screening guideline around the world. We used PubMed, google and central as the primary source of database. Searching keyword is including “prostate cancer screening guideline”. Key information including name of guideline, year of publishing, recommendation strategy, cut-point age and cut-point prostate specific antigen level (PSA) were extracted into standardized data extraction form. We used two researchers to involve in searching, extracting and quality assessment process and inconsistency were solved during the consensus.

RESULTS

:
From the result of systematic review, most prostate cancer screening guideline is come from North America region. The major recommendation screening strategy is shared-decision screening with informed risk and benefit to the participants. Age to start screening is set at 50 years or 55 years and end at 69 years. Prostate specific antigen (PSA) Cut-point is set at 4 ng/ml. Many guidelines recommend starting screening at 45 years in high risk population including African-American race and men who have family history of prostate cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

:
Different guidelines from various country suggest the use of prostate cancer screening as shared decision strategy. Cut-point age and PSA level are inconsistent among guidelines. Therefore, the screening strategy should be defined as local context and individualized based on each country’s specific evidence.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2018-09, ISPOR Asia Pacific 2018, Tokyo, Japan

Value in Health, Vol. 21, S2 (September 2018)

Code

PIH29

Topic

Health Service Delivery & Process of Care

Topic Subcategory

Treatment Patterns and Guidelines

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×