SCREENING FOR LATENT AND ACTIVE TUBERCULOSIS INFECTION IN CHINESE OLDER PEOPLE ON ENTRY TO LONG-TERM CARE FACILITIES IS WORTHWHILE- A COST-EFFECTIVENESS STUDY IN HONG KONG

Author(s)

Li J1, Yip BH1, Leung C2, Zhao J3, Yeoh E1, Chung P1
1Jockey School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China, 2Tuberculosis and Chest Service, Department of Health, Hong Kong, China, 3China Association of Enterprises with Foreign Investment, R&D-based Pharmaceutical Association Committee, Beijing, China

OBJECTIVES

:
Tuberculosis (TB) in older people remains one of public health challenges in Hong Kong. In the absence of active response, current passive case-finding strategy has limited impact on TB elimination. In order to bridge research gap and inform local TB program, this study was conducted to examine the cost-effectiveness of screening strategies in older people on entry to long-term care facilities compared with current strategy.

METHODS

:
From a health service provider perspective and 20-year time horizon, we structured a decision analysis and Markov model to compare four strategies: (i) current strategy, (ii) CXR screening and (iii) Xpert screening respectively represent TB screening in suspects by chest X-ray and Xpert MTB/RIF, and (iv) LTBI/TB screening represents screening for latent and active TB infection by Interferon-Gamma Release Assays and chest X-ray. The outcomes were direct medical costs, life-years, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) measured by incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).

RESULTS

:
In the base-case analysis, current strategy was the most cost-saving; CXR screening was dominated by Xpert screening; LTBI/TB screening gained the highest life-years and QALYs. The ICERs of LTBI/TB screening were US$19,712 and US$29,951 per QALY gained compared with non-dominated strategies. At the willingness-to-pay threshold of US$50,000 per QALY gained, LTBI/TB screening was the most cost-effective, particularly when probability of annual LTBI reactivation was greater than 0.155% and its screening acceptability was greater than 38% in one-way sensitivity analysis. In 1,000 iterations of Monte Carlo simulation, the probabilities of current strategy, CXR screening, Xpert screening, and LTBI/TB screening to be cost-effective were 0, 1.3%, 20.1%, and 78.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

:
Screening for latent and active TB infection in high-risk older people appears highly effective and cost-effective. The key findings may provide an alternative solution to bring down TB endemic and warrant further research in areas like Hong Kong.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2018-09, ISPOR Asia Pacific 2018, Tokyo, Japan

Value in Health, Vol. 21, S2 (September 2018)

Code

PIN50

Topic

Health Technology Assessment

Topic Subcategory

Decision & Deliberative Processes

Disease

Geriatrics, Infectious Disease (non-vaccine)

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×