PRESENCE OF LIPOHYPERTROPHY AND ITS RELATION TO INSULIN INJECTION PRACTICES IN PATIENTS WITH TYPE 1 DIABETES MELLITUS

Author(s)

Barola A1, Tiwari P1, Bhansali A2, Grover S2
1National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), S.A.S. Nagar (Mohali), Punjab, India, 2Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India

OBJECTIVES: Lipohypertrophy (LH) is a major complication of insulin therapy causing unpredictable insulin absorption and cosmetic concern to patients. The present study was aimed to assess the frequency of lipohypertrophy at injection sites and its relation with injection practice among Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) patients attending a tertiary care hospital in Northern India. METHODS: Cross-sectional questionnaire on demography, insulin injection practices and anomalies at injection sites, was administered to 31 T1D patients and/or their caregiver. Patients using syringe and/or pen since 3 months were enrolled in the study. RESULTS: The mean age of patients (n=31) was 16.89±6.4 years; the average duration of diabetes 63.8 months and mean HbA1c (n=28) of 10.21±2.89%. The daily frequency of injection was four in 23 patients, followed by three in 4, two in 3, and one in 1 patient. Lipohypertrophy was observed in 10 patients whereas lipoatrophy in 1 patient (32.3% vs.3.2%). 9 patients had lipodystrophic lesions in abdomen as it was the preferred site of injection by 27 patients. All patients admitted injecting into lipodystrophic areas. Interestingly, the odds of having LH in the presence of rotation routine is 1/6th than that of the absence of rotation (OR 0.167, 95% CI-.029-.95), and was statistically significant (p 0.048, one-sided Fischer-exact test). Only 19 patients utilised available area fully. Although statistically insignificant (p>0.05), LH seemed to be more frequent in patients using smaller injecting areas than the larger ones (50% vs.27%). A statistically significant association was not found between LH and needle reuse. However, mean use of needle was higher in the LH group than the non-LH group (12.7 times vs 8.5 times). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the well-established evidences supporting use of rotation routine, large injection areas and avoidance of needle reuse for the prevention of LH, the results of the present study confirms that these practices need to be readdressed.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2016-09, ISPOR Asia Pacific 2016, Singapore

Value in Health, Vol. 19, No. 7 (November 2016)

Code

PDB10

Topic

Epidemiology & Public Health

Disease

Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×