IDENTIFICATION OF STATIN INTOLERANCE- RESULTS FROM A SURVEY OF CLINICIANS IN JAPAN

Author(s)

McKendrick J1, Gandra SR2, Hovingh GK3, Dent R4, Wieffer H1, Catapano AL5, Oh P6, Rosenson RS7, Stroes ES3
1PRMA Consulting Ltd, Fleet, UK, 2Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 3Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 4Amgen, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 5University of Milano and IRCCS Multimedica, Milano, Italy, 6Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada, 7Mount Sinai Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA

OBJECTIVES: To understand how Japanese clinicians identify patients with statin intolerance (SI). METHODS: A web-based survey was conducted in Japan between January-February 2014. The survey asked participants to report on how they identify patients with SI. Specialists and general/family physicians (GPs) participated; they were required to have treated ≥75 and 50 patients with hypercholesterolemia, respectively, in the previous 12 months, and ≥5 patients presenting with SI symptoms. Participants provided informed consent. RESULTS: Forty specialists and 20 GPs completed the survey. All symptoms of potential SI were reported at similar frequency by specialists and GPs. Muscle-related symptoms (MRS) were identified by clinicians as the most common symptom (50%), with 42% of patients having elevated creatine kinase (CK) without MRS, and 26% persistent elevation of transaminase. Other symptoms (14%) (e.g. gastric symptoms or alopecia) and CNS effects (1%) were less common at presentation. Rechallenge was the minimum criterion used by 65% of specialists and 50% of GPs to establish whether MRS were due to SI. Clinicians who did not rechallenge (40%) would try either discontinuing the statin (22%) or lowering the dose (12%) to determine whether MRS resolved. Overall, 63% of specialists and 70% of GPs would try ≥2 statins before considering a patient with MRS to have SI. Most clinicians (80%) would recheck known elevation of CK after modifying or discontinuing statin treatment. The majority of respondents (72%) reported they would use additional criteria to establish statin intolerance in patients at high risk of a CV event. CONCLUSIONS: A survey conducted in Japan has shown that the majority of clinicians use rechallenge and alternative statins before considering that a patient with MRS has SI, in accordance with recent global guidance on SI management.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2016-09, ISPOR Asia Pacific 2016, Singapore

Value in Health, Vol. 19, No. 7 (November 2016)

Code

PCV60

Topic

Health Service Delivery & Process of Care

Topic Subcategory

Treatment Patterns and Guidelines

Disease

Cardiovascular Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×