HEALTH CARE RESOURCE USE AMONG ADVANCED GASTRIC CANCER PATIENTS IN TAIWAN AND SOUTH KOREA

Author(s)

Rajan N1, Cuyun Carter G2, Kaltenboeck A3, Ivanova J3, Liepa AM2, San Roman A4, Koh M3, Ballal S5, Birnbaum H4, Cheng R6, Chen J7, Bang YJ8
1Eli Lilly and Company, West Ryde, Australia, 2Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA, 3Analysis Group, Inc., New York, NY, USA, 4Analysis Group, Inc., Boston, MA, USA, 5ImClone Systems, Inc., New York, NY, USA, 6Eli Lilly and Company, Taipei, Taiwan, 7Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan, 8Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea

OBJECTIVES: To assess healthcare resource use associated with the treatment of metastatic and/or locally recurrent, unresectable gastric cancer (MGC), including cancer of the stomach and gastro-oesophageal junction, in Taiwan and South Korea. METHODS: Physicians, randomly selected from a panel of oncologists and study referrals, supplied de-identified information via an online chart abstraction instrument, for ≤10 randomly selected patients with MGC. Patients were required to have received platinum/fluoropyrimidine first-line therapy, followed by second-line therapy or best supportive care (BSC) only. Data were analysed using summary statistics. RESULTS: Data were collected (2/2013–7/2013) for 122 patients from 37 physicians in Taiwan, and for 198 patients from 30 physicians in South Korea. Key demographics in Taiwan and South Korea, respectively, included: men (62.3%; 73.7%); mean age (59.8 years; 61.3 years). Following first-line treatment, patients in Taiwan and South Korea, respectively, received: second line (64.8%; 80.3%); BSC alone (35.2%; 19.7%); third line (13.1%; 23.2%). Inpatient hospitalisation rates (≥1 stay) in Taiwan and South Korea, respectively, were: overall, i.e. including periods of no line of treatment (82.8%, [101/122]; 48.5%, [96/198]); first line (63.1%, [77/122]; 35.9%, [71/198]); second line (53.2%, [42/79]; 30.2%, [48/159]); BSC alone (39.5%, [17/43]; 33.3%, [13/39]); third line (68.8%, [11/16]; 23.9%, [11/46]). In both countries, inpatient hospitalisations were of similar mean length (Taiwan, 8.6 days [SD 10.0]; South Korea, 8.7 days [SD 9.8]). Most common reasons for inpatient hospitalisation were chemotherapy infusions (Taiwan, 59.8%; South Korea, 67.9%) and disease symptom management (Taiwan, 30.4%; South Korea, 20.3%). Overall, antiemetics and analgesics were the most common supportive-care agents; endoscopy was the most common procedure. CONCLUSIONS: In both countries, >60% of patients with MGC received second-line treatment; post-first-line treatments were more common in South Korea than Taiwan. The healthcare resource burden of MGC is considerable in both countries, as hospitalisation is common, particularly in Taiwan.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2014-09, ISPOR Asia Pacific 2014, Beijing, China

Value in Health, Vol. 17, No. 7 (November 2014)

Code

PCN7

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Budget Impact Analysis, Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×