DOES PUBLIC HEALTH SPENDING MATTER? EVIDENCE FROM CHINA PROVINCIAL PANEL DATA

Author(s)

Yuan J1, Shao Z21University of Macau, Macau, Macau, 2China Research Institute for Fiscal Science, Beijing, China

OBJECTIVES: The prevailing view in the literature is that additional government health input has little effect on mortality and/or morbidity. In China, however, this is not an accepted consensus. Researchers and policy makers are still debating whether market or government should take more responsibilities in the health care area. In this paper, we aim to investigate the efficiency of China public health spending. METHODS: We obtain unique China provincial level panel data and use fixed effect model to test the relationship between public health spending and morbidity rate of thirteen infectious diseases. RESULTS: We find that budgetary allocation to epidemic prevention and control expenses has little impact on reducing the morbidity rate of the sample infectious diseases in China. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the efficiency of public health spending is crucial in designing public health policy in China, especially when the health care system reform enters the deep water.   The above finding suggests that the policy maker should seriously consider the role of government in the future health care reform.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2012-09, ISPOR Asia Pacific 2012, Taipei, Taiwan

Value in Health, Vol. 15, No. 7 (November 2012)

Code

PHP93

Topic

Health Service Delivery & Process of Care

Topic Subcategory

Health Care Research, Quality of Care Measurement

Disease

Multiple Diseases

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×